linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] objtool: Support CROSS_COMPILE
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 21:46:05 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160303034605.GB10338@treble.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160303143843.6eaf80b5@canb.auug.org.au>

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 02:38:43PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Josh,
> 
> On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 21:20:58 -0600 Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 01:43:14PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > 
> > > I was wondering if this would be more appropriate in scripts/objtool
> > > since it is used during the building of the kernel.  Or does it have a
> > > wider use?  
> > 
> > Yeah, it was actually in the scripts/ dir in earlier revisions of the
> > patch set, for that very reason.  However, Ingo pointed out that it
> > could be useful beyond the kernel, so we graduated it to a "tool".
> > 
> > > 
> > > We have HOSTCC with its associated HOSTCFLAGS etc ... I am not sure if
> > > that is more appropriate (but it does take care of people using clang).  
> > 
> > The "tools" are almost completely separate from the rest of the kernel.
> > They have their own scaled-down version of kbuild, which doesn't have
> > HOSTCC.
> > 
> > But yeah, we might eventually need to copy some of the host compilation
> > infrastructure from scripts/Makefile.host over to the tools/ side.
> 
> That all sounds sane, thanks.
> 
> I did not add this to linux-next today, but may tomorrow if people
> think it is sensible to do so (for testing on a powerpcle host).  If I
> do, I will just back out to the previous patch if it all goes south (so
> it won't impact on the rest of the tip tree's testing).

Sounds good, thanks!

FWIW, I did test it on a ppc64le host with an x86 cross-compiler and it
worked fine (but more testing is certainly welcome).

-- 
Josh

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-03  3:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-01  1:29 linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-01  7:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-01  7:28   ` Sedat Dilek
2016-03-01  7:39     ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-03-01  8:41       ` Sedat Dilek
2016-03-01  9:45       ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-01  9:40   ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-01 21:54     ` [PATCH] objtool: Disable stack validation when CROSS_COMPILE is used Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-02  2:27       ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-02 21:17         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-02 22:21           ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-03  0:39             ` [PATCH 0/2] objtool: Cross-compilation support Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-03  0:39               ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/asm/decoder: Use explicitly signed chars Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-03 16:51                 ` [tip:core/objtool] " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-03 19:00                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-03-03  0:39               ` [PATCH 2/2] objtool: Support CROSS_COMPILE Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-03  2:43                 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-03  3:20                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-03  3:38                     ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-03  3:46                       ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2016-03-03 15:10                       ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-03 22:59                         ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-03 15:23                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-03-03 16:52                 ` [tip:core/objtool] " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-03  7:31         ` [PATCH] objtool: Disable stack validation when CROSS_COMPILE is used Sedat Dilek
2016-03-03  7:57           ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160303034605.GB10338@treble.redhat.com \
    --to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).