From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754822AbcCJRzC (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:55:02 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f172.google.com ([209.85.192.172]:35867 "EHLO mail-pf0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754794AbcCJRyo (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:54:44 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:54:38 +0100 From: Thierry Reding To: Doug Anderson Cc: Boris Brezillon , Heiko =?utf-8?Q?St=C3=BCbner?= , linux-pwm , Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood , Jingoo Han , Lee Jones , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Bryan Wu , Richard Purdie , Jacek Anaszewski , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Ripard , linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Tomi Valkeinen , Daniel Mack , Haojian Zhuang , Robert Jarzmik , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= , Olof Johansson Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update Message-ID: <20160310175438.GA5648@ulmo.nvidia.com> References: <20160203145337.GD9650@ulmo> <20160222175929.GA23899@ulmo> <20160223143859.GA27656@ulmo> <20160223181448.GA14754@ulmo.nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 08:34:19AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote: > Thierry, >=20 > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Doug Anderson wrot= e: > > So just to summarize: > > > > * Add pwm_get_state(), pwm_apply_state(), pwm_get_args(). > > pwm_get_state() initially returns 0 for duty cycle if driver doesn't > > support readout. > > > > * Re-implement pwm_get_period() (and maybe other similar functions) > > atop pwm_get_state() as you describe earlier in the thread. > > > > * Document pwm_get_period() (and maybe other similar functions) as depr= ecated. > > > > * Fix drivers for all current 2 users of PWM regulator to support > > hardware readout. > > > > * Update PWM regulator as you described earlier in the thread (Feb 23). > > > > * If PWM regulator is ever used on a new board whose PWM doesn't > > support hardware readout, the voltage will change at probe time. > > > > > > Did I get all that right? Thanks! >=20 > Can you provide a "yes, you got that right" or a "no, you didn't > understand"? That will unblock Boris, I think. Sounds about right. Hopefully this will eliminate any objections that others had about the series. Thierry --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJW4bTZAAoJEN0jrNd/PrOhfFMP/i39c8UFiwiFql3iBo11t0Fl ZCb1wOtEkvJlJHsE4wdS05PwMtP51e/2k96Swnusv26ODELfBYBRjEAiecuY7pdZ wpypYzEc/95+2KT5/qJt/bMVhlydF/Gdv45Ri5gXJcTDsmEcVxt1K2C6BsyxUELF ukSgK6aDeje8cqBkqYkoJ9OpsQFRn8MvVPwhWj3YtiEFape0DZnNVUorJSRH+AGq 9rcfK2lnMMbs0tqCHB8R/QIOhKhdWnOnZc6//M5xAcGaEo0FZFJKvl07Tu2p6LGn nPgvOUVkyXNekKfU6M7BhRcaQC1P7i5v90PLISxKHcXlXld2Z1jZmXThSy1hXPlb ZYlG+AXoOTes48yul+HfIj0y9ng+5QnbuWibbkepHHhZTyDLeiLi8ekzNAWoARJ9 Fu0BHuH6afcJroymsI77/SHFn0cSJesTl3yzDT0zrqQ0AWKMvr+qetxn4OUKESSV qmbDoed9SfrlKFwKKldhuk9L0OallHC0iEetSQTDbaue7opRq4tH1F/4ZtUEeRZW t7g6ll9NNMILuRQplvT8L1t+CgFtifey+QA69NSm+Q9OZmRWngN1W7N5WbEdj4I5 OdGG1MgLxWPf69v+5iBZezneMsCNxGmkpYKEbDyXFPAaQ+AljQ6crIlj8qnjby2+ w+ceXXTMzJ3e9BfUd6Y0 =HFNr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR--