From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935353AbcCKIgh (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2016 03:36:37 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45745 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934880AbcCKIg3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2016 03:36:29 -0500 Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 09:36:24 +0100 From: Jiri Olsa To: Namhyung Kim Cc: Jiri Olsa , Steven Rostedt , lkml , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ftrace perf: Check sample types only for sampling events Message-ID: <20160311083624.GB1052@krava.redhat.com> References: <1457556405-27717-1-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org> <1457556405-27717-2-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org> <20160310003637.GA21119@sejong> <20160310072502.GA11206@krava.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160310072502.GA11206@krava.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 08:25:02AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 09:36:37AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > Hi Jiri, > > > > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 09:46:41PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > Currently we check sample type for ftrace:function event > > > even if it's not created as sampling event. That prevents > > > creating ftrace_function event in counting mode. > > > > > > Making sure we check sample types only for sampling events. > > > > > > Before: > > > $ sudo perf stat -e ftrace:function ls > > > ... > > > > > > Performance counter stats for 'ls': > > > > > > ftrace:function > > > > > > 0.001983662 seconds time elapsed > > > > > > After: > > > $ sudo perf stat -e ftrace:function ls > > > ... > > > > > > Performance counter stats for 'ls': > > > > > > 44,498 ftrace:function > > > > > > 0.037534722 seconds time elapsed > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa > > > --- > > > kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c | 4 ++-- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c > > > index 00df25fd86ef..a7171ec2c1ca 100644 > > > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c > > > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c > > > @@ -52,14 +52,14 @@ static int perf_trace_event_perm(struct trace_event_call *tp_event, > > > * event, due to issues with page faults while tracing page > > > * fault handler and its overall trickiness nature. > > > */ > > > - if (!p_event->attr.exclude_callchain_user) > > > + if (is_sampling_event(p_event) && !p_event->attr.exclude_callchain_user) > > > return -EINVAL; > > > > > > /* > > > * Same reason to disable user stack dump as for user space > > > * callchains above. > > > */ > > > - if (p_event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER) > > > + if (is_sampling_event(p_event) && p_event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER) > > > return -EINVAL; > > > } > > > > > > > What about checking is_sampling_event() first and goto the last > > paranoid_tracepoint_raw check instead? This way we can remove the > > same check in the function trace case. > > right, will check hum, did you mean something like this? I'd rather keep it the original way.. seems more straight jirka --- diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c index 00df25fd86ef..7c1edb57c823 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c @@ -44,23 +44,22 @@ static int perf_trace_event_perm(struct trace_event_call *tp_event, /* The ftrace function trace is allowed only for root. */ if (ftrace_event_is_function(tp_event)) { - if (perf_paranoid_tracepoint_raw() && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) - return -EPERM; - /* * We don't allow user space callchains for function trace * event, due to issues with page faults while tracing page * fault handler and its overall trickiness nature. */ - if (!p_event->attr.exclude_callchain_user) + if (is_sampling_event(p_event) && !p_event->attr.exclude_callchain_user) return -EINVAL; /* * Same reason to disable user stack dump as for user space * callchains above. */ - if (p_event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER) + if (is_sampling_event(p_event) && p_event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER) return -EINVAL; + + goto root_check; } /* No tracing, just counting, so no obvious leak */ @@ -73,6 +72,7 @@ static int perf_trace_event_perm(struct trace_event_call *tp_event, return 0; } +root_check: /* * ...otherwise raw tracepoint data can be a severe data leak, * only allow root to have these.