linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	"Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Got FPU related warning on Intel Quark during boot
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:08:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160311090840.GA8486@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrW5_GfXYCgocmESHf3G-2RWmhmc-+81fX0eDxFH5vu3VQ@mail.gmail.com>


* Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 03:31:43PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> Looks like it lacks that one.
> >>
> >> # grep -i fxsr /proc/cpuinfo; echo $?
> >> 1
> >
> > Ok, so looking at where the warning comes from:
> >
> > [   14.714533] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 823 at arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h:163 fpu__clear+0x8c/0x160
> >
> > static inline void copy_kernel_to_fxregs(struct fxregs_state *fx)
> > {
> >         int err;
> >
> >         if (config_enabled(CONFIG_X86_32)) {
> >                 err = check_insn(fxrstor %[fx], "=m" (*fx), [fx] "m" (*fx));
> >                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >         } else {
> >
> >         ...
> >
> >         /* Copying from a kernel buffer to FPU registers should never fail: */
> >         WARN_ON_FPU(err);
> >
> >
> > and the stacktrace is pretty clear:
> >
> > flush_thread
> > |-> fpu__clear(&tsk->thread.fpu);
> >     |-> we are eager by default here:
> >
> >         if (!use_eager_fpu() || !static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FPU)) {
> >                 /* FPU state will be reallocated lazily at the first use. */
> >                 fpu__drop(fpu);
> >         } else {
> >
> >                 --> we're in that branch.
> >
> >                 copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs();
> >                 |-> copy_kernel_to_fxregs()
> >
> >
> > I think we should use FRSTOR on quark, i.e., copy_kernel_to_fregs().
> >
> > Does this untested wild guess even work?
> >
> > ---
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> > index dea8e76d60c6..bbafe5e8a1a6 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> > @@ -474,8 +474,11 @@ static inline void copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs(void)
> >  {
> >         if (use_xsave())
> >                 copy_kernel_to_xregs(&init_fpstate.xsave, -1);
> > -       else
> > +       else if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FXSR))
> >                 copy_kernel_to_fxregs(&init_fpstate.fxsave);
> > +       else
> > +               copy_kernel_to_fregs(&init_fpstate.fsave);
> > +
> >  }
> >
> 
> This looks wrong, too:
> 
> /*
>  * Once per bootup FPU initialization sequences that will run on most x86 CPUs:
>  */
> static void __init fpu__init_system_generic(void)
> {
>     /*
>      * Set up the legacy init FPU context. (xstate init might overwrite this
>      * with a more modern format, if the CPU supports it.)
>      */
>     fpstate_init_fxstate(&init_fpstate.fxsave);  <-- wrong format on pre-FXSR CPUs

Indeed:

static inline void fpstate_init_fxstate(struct fxregs_state *fx)
{
        fx->cwd = 0x37f;
        fx->mxcsr = MXCSR_DEFAULT;
}

I assumed that the fxstate init is outside the legacy FPU context area, but they 
overlap: fx->cwd is the first two bytes, and fx->mxcsr overlaps the middle of the 
legacy area.

We do a later fpstate_init_fstate(), which does:

static inline void fpstate_init_fstate(struct fregs_state *fp)
{
        fp->cwd = 0xffff037fu;
        fp->swd = 0xffff0000u;
        fp->twd = 0xffffffffu;
        fp->fos = 0xffff0000u;
}

which accidentally overwrites the cwd bit - but AFAICS fx->mxcsw overlaps the 
first legacy FPU register?

So yes, this needs to be fixed too.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-11  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-10 10:46 Got FPU related warning on Intel Quark during boot Andy Shevchenko
2016-03-10 11:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-10 12:48   ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-03-10 12:56     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-10 13:31       ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-03-10 14:59         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-10 15:22           ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-03-10 15:45             ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2016-03-10 16:49               ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-10 17:15                 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2016-03-10 19:06                   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-11  1:31               ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-11 10:50                 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2016-03-11  1:39           ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-11  9:08             ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2016-03-11  9:48               ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-11 11:02                 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2016-03-11 11:26                   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-11 11:32                     ` [PATCH] x86/FPU: Fix FPU handling on legacy FPU machines Borislav Petkov
2016-03-11 18:32                       ` Linus Torvalds
2016-03-11 22:03                         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-11 22:07                           ` Dave Hansen
2016-03-11 22:20                             ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-12 17:21                               ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-12 17:47                                 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-12 12:04                           ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2016-03-12 12:27                             ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-12 15:17                           ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-22 22:03                           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2016-03-12 15:08                         ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-12 15:12                           ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-12 15:16                       ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/fpu: Fix eager-FPU " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160311090840.GA8486@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).