From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751329AbcCKJwB (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 11 Mar 2016 04:52:01 -0500
Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:60831 "EHLO
	mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750744AbcCKJv5 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 11 Mar 2016 04:51:57 -0500
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:51:46 +0100
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@google.com>,
        Heiko =?UTF-8?B?U3TDvGJuZXI=?= <heiko@sntech.de>,
        linux-pwm <linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com>, Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>,
        Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com>,
        linux-leds@vger.kernel.org,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
        linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
        Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
        Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
        Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>,
        Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Uwe =?UTF-8?B?S2xlaW5lLUvDtm5pZw==?= 
	<u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update
Message-ID: <20160311105146.510468ef@bbrezillon>
In-Reply-To: <20160310175438.GA5648@ulmo.nvidia.com>
References: <20160203145337.GD9650@ulmo>
	<CAD=FV=U_x1cxx6RrHuVgVV8GbOwm9DXXJcyiArbbQySUOaxrvQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160222175929.GA23899@ulmo>
	<CAD=FV=UCErW3EjYRtwt49_ztNR7cyY4U0o4R_dxdomer-Ac2Dg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160223143859.GA27656@ulmo>
	<CAD=FV=UvxG3MYD4MKQJqN7W68uMjd-s+FH-e8tkrLCpS0RLmZQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160223181448.GA14754@ulmo.nvidia.com>
	<CAD=FV=VM3cOQ0HqwLANBw9MVBCyFTrSyPe_dGzgPucuMUEWRKA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAD=FV=VckTVD8b1g+f0G2kMeoTjvY0pAGhoDnWQN_dAmqSxBxg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAD=FV=W3KPf8tyMviVNB9=HjefMdP+FBbN01Zhh7RKH+gkj2WQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160310175438.GA5648@ulmo.nvidia.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi Thierry,

On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:54:38 +0100
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 08:34:19AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Thierry,
> > 
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders@google.com> wrote:
> > > So just to summarize:
> > >
> > > * Add pwm_get_state(), pwm_apply_state(), pwm_get_args().
> > > pwm_get_state() initially returns 0 for duty cycle if driver doesn't
> > > support readout.
> > >
> > > * Re-implement pwm_get_period() (and maybe other similar functions)
> > > atop pwm_get_state() as you describe earlier in the thread.
> > >
> > > * Document pwm_get_period() (and maybe other similar functions) as deprecated.
> > >
> > > * Fix drivers for all current 2 users of PWM regulator to support
> > > hardware readout.
> > >
> > > * Update PWM regulator as you described earlier in the thread (Feb 23).
> > >
> > > * If PWM regulator is ever used on a new board whose PWM doesn't
> > > support hardware readout, the voltage will change at probe time.
> > >
> > >
> > > Did I get all that right?  Thanks!
> > 
> > Can you provide a "yes, you got that right" or a "no, you didn't
> > understand"?  That will unblock Boris, I think.
> 
> Sounds about right. Hopefully this will eliminate any objections that
> others had about the series.

Okay, I'll rework the series accordingly and send a new version soon.

Thanks,

Boris

-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com