From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932575AbcCKWDf (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:03:35 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:44941 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932199AbcCKWDd (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:03:33 -0500 Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 23:03:13 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Ingo Molnar , "Bryan O'Donoghue" , Andy Lutomirski , Andy Shevchenko , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" , Fenghua Yu , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , Dave Hansen , Oleg Nesterov , "Yu, Yu-cheng" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/FPU: Fix FPU handling on legacy FPU machines Message-ID: <20160311220313.GG4312@pd.tnic> References: <20160310125610.GA26708@pd.tnic> <20160310145940.GB26708@pd.tnic> <20160311090840.GA8486@gmail.com> <20160311094802.GA4312@pd.tnic> <1457694124.2007.12.camel@nexus-software.ie> <20160311112610.GC4312@pd.tnic> <20160311113206.GD4312@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:32:43AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Obvious Ack to the patch, along with a "how did this ever work > before?" comment.. I had a sarcastic sentence in the commit message which I deleted later: "Apparently no one had tried the kernel on a 486er after the FPU rewrite. Backwards compatibility is overrated." :-) I'm still wondering, though, why didn't the Quark people scream earlier... And who knows, it was probably b0rked even before the FPU rewrite. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.