On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:18:19AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 05:19:17PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > The variable p is a data structure which is used by the driver core > > internally and it is not expected that busses will be directly accessing > > these driver core internal only data. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee > > --- > > > > Reference of Greg's comment about it at: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/5/171 > > > > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 6 ++++-- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c > > index 2949ab3..2f31fb5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c > > +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c > > @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ static struct device_type i2c_client_type; > > static int i2c_detect(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, struct i2c_driver *driver); > > > > static struct static_key i2c_trace_msg = STATIC_KEY_INIT_FALSE; > > +static bool is_registered; > > > > void i2c_transfer_trace_reg(void) > > { > > @@ -1529,7 +1530,7 @@ static int i2c_register_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adap) > > int res = 0; > > > > /* Can't register until after driver model init */ > > - if (unlikely(WARN_ON(!i2c_bus_type.p))) { > > + if (unlikely(WARN_ON(!is_registered))) { > > res = -EAGAIN; > > goto out_list; > > } > > @@ -1926,7 +1927,7 @@ int i2c_register_driver(struct module *owner, struct i2c_driver *driver) > > int res; > > > > /* Can't register until after driver model init */ > > - if (unlikely(WARN_ON(!i2c_bus_type.p))) > > + if (unlikely(WARN_ON(!is_registered))) > > return -EAGAIN; > > > > /* add the driver to the list of i2c drivers in the driver core */ > > @@ -2118,6 +2119,7 @@ static int __init i2c_init(void) > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC)) > > WARN_ON(of_reconfig_notifier_register(&i2c_of_notifier)); > > > > + is_registered = true; > > return 0; > > > > class_err: > > This doesn't work. I see a number of these WARN_ON()s trigger and I > think the reason is that i2c_init() always fails now. The cause seems to > be that i2c_init() calls i2c_add_driver(&dummy_driver), which will now > always fail, because is_register is set to true *after* that call. There > is no way I see I2C working at all after this patch. FWIW, the below on top of your patch seems to fix things for me. Thierry --- >8 --- diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c index f4726cdbb06a..f8723a474e28 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c @@ -2112,6 +2112,8 @@ static int __init i2c_init(void) goto bus_err; } #endif + is_registered = true; + retval = i2c_add_driver(&dummy_driver); if (retval) goto class_err; @@ -2119,7 +2121,6 @@ static int __init i2c_init(void) if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC)) WARN_ON(of_reconfig_notifier_register(&i2c_of_notifier)); - is_registered = true; return 0; class_err: