From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Updated version of RD/WR FS/GS BASE patchkit
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 23:52:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160321225248.GI5083@two.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXbZuVacSGBUvbcQQqUaqCtmOOXJv_pc=wA4mtnGy-nPQ@mail.gmail.com>
> No. My objection is that there needs to be an explicit statement what
> the semantics are. If the agreed-upon semantics are "undefined
> behavior if GS != 0 and GSBASE doesn't match the descriptor", so be
> it, but this needs to be a conscious decision and needs to be weighed
> against the alternatives.
Documentation/x86/fsgs.txt already has this statement:
>>>
Another requirement is that the FS or GS selector has to be zero
(is normally true unless changed explicitly). When it is non-zero
the context switch assumes the bases were loaded through the LDT/GDT,
and will reload that.
<<<
Is that sufficient?
>
> The actual implementation details are just details. They need to
> match the intended semantics, of course.
I believe my implementation matches the paragraph above.
-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-21 22:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-21 16:16 Updated version of RD/WR FS/GS BASE patchkit Andi Kleen
2016-03-21 16:16 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86: Add intrinsics/macros for new rd/wr fs/gs base instructions Andi Kleen
2016-03-21 18:14 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-21 16:16 ` [PATCH 2/9] x86: Add support for rd/wr fs/gs base Andi Kleen
2016-03-21 18:13 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-21 19:05 ` Andi Kleen
2016-03-21 19:22 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-21 22:05 ` Andi Kleen
2016-03-21 22:08 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-21 22:15 ` Andi Kleen
2016-03-22 8:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-03-22 14:40 ` Brian Gerst
2016-04-15 0:06 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-21 16:16 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86: Make old K8 swapgs workaround conditional Andi Kleen
2016-03-21 16:16 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86: Enumerate kernel FSGS capability in AT_HWCAP2 Andi Kleen
2016-03-21 18:49 ` Brian Gerst
2016-03-21 18:54 ` Andi Kleen
2016-03-21 19:32 ` Brian Gerst
2016-03-21 19:43 ` Andi Kleen
2016-03-21 22:10 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-21 16:16 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86: Add documentation for rd/wr fs/gs base Andi Kleen
2016-03-23 19:14 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2016-03-21 16:16 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86: Use rd/wr fs/gs base in arch_prctl Andi Kleen
2016-03-21 18:17 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-21 16:16 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86: Add self test code for fsgsbase Andi Kleen
2016-03-21 16:16 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86: Support arbitrary fs/gs base in getregs Andi Kleen
2016-03-21 16:16 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86: Save FS/GS base in core dump Andi Kleen
2016-03-21 18:39 ` Updated version of RD/WR FS/GS BASE patchkit Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-21 19:03 ` Andi Kleen
2016-03-21 19:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-21 19:40 ` Andi Kleen
2016-03-21 22:05 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-21 22:11 ` Andi Kleen
2016-03-21 22:27 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-21 22:41 ` Andi Kleen
2016-03-21 22:47 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-21 22:52 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2016-03-21 22:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-21 23:02 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160321225248.GI5083@two.firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).