From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with Linus' tree
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 03:30:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160330103031.GC4287@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160330113214.4110cd63@canb.auug.org.au>
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:32:14AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in:
>
> kernel/rcu/tree.c
>
> between commit:
>
> abedf8e2419f ("rcu: Use simple wait queues where possible in rcutree")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 08cace5914ea ("DIAGS: Crude exploratory hack")
>
> from the rcu tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I used the rcu tree version) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
>
> I really don't think that that rcu tree patch should be in linux-next,
> right?
Right you are! I will rework to get the diagnostics out of your way.
-Might- have helped find one of the bugs, but don't look now...
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-30 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-30 0:32 linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-30 10:30 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-10-17 22:41 Stephen Rothwell
2022-10-18 18:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-07-08 4:12 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-08 15:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-12 0:46 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-12 1:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-18 3:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-18 3:49 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-18 14:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-14 3:46 Stephen Rothwell
2018-05-15 17:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-09-26 3:00 Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-26 3:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-09-26 3:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-08 0:46 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-08 0:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-30 0:23 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-29 3:06 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-29 22:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-06 2:31 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-27 6:04 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-27 12:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-27 5:14 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-27 13:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-10-06 2:38 Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-06 4:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160330103031.GC4287@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).