From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757966AbcCaS50 (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:57:26 -0400 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:54556 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755652AbcCaS5X (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:57:23 -0400 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 20:57:18 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Thierry Reding , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Mike Turquette , Stephen Boyd , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood , Kamil Debski , lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Bryan Wu , Richard Purdie , Jacek Anaszewski , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Ripard , Chen-Yu Tsai , linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, Joachim Eastwood , Thomas Petazzoni , Heiko Stuebner , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Jingoo Han , Lee Jones , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Tomi Valkeinen , Robert Jarzmik , Alexandre Belloni , Kukjin Kim , Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter , Jani Nikula , Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hartley Sweeten , Ryan Mallon , Alexander Shiyan , Milo Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 36/46] input: misc: max77693: switch to the atomic API Message-ID: <20160331205718.057a6f38@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <20160331174801.GC39098@dtor-ws> References: <1459368249-13241-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <1459368249-13241-37-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <20160331174801.GC39098@dtor-ws> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:48:01 -0700 Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi Boris, > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:03:59PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > pwm_config/enable/disable() have been deprecated and should be replaced > > by pwm_apply_state(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon > > --- > > drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------ > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c b/drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c > > index cf6aac0..aef7dc4 100644 > > --- a/drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c > > +++ b/drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c > > @@ -70,13 +70,16 @@ struct max77693_haptic { > > > > static int max77693_haptic_set_duty_cycle(struct max77693_haptic *haptic) > > { > > + struct pwm_state pstate; > > struct pwm_args pargs = { }; > > - int delta; > > int error; > > > > pwm_get_args(haptic->pwm_dev, &pargs); > > - delta = (pargs.period + haptic->pwm_duty) / 2; > > - error = pwm_config(haptic->pwm_dev, delta, pargs.period); > > + pwm_get_state(haptic->pwm_dev, &pstate); > > + > > + pstate.period = pargs.period; > > + pstate.duty_cycle = (pargs.period + haptic->pwm_duty) / 2; > > + error = pwm_apply_state(haptic->pwm_dev, &pstate); > > This does not make sense with regard to the atomic API. If you look in > max77693_haptic_play_work(), right after calling > max77693_haptic_set_duty_cycle() we either try to enable or disable the > pwm. When switching to this new API we should combine both actions. True. I'll address that, unless Thierry is fine keeping the non-atomic API, in which case I'll just drop patches 32 to 46. > > > if (error) { > > dev_err(haptic->dev, "failed to configure pwm: %d\n", error); > > return error; > > @@ -161,12 +164,16 @@ static int max77693_haptic_lowsys(struct max77693_haptic *haptic, bool enable) > > > > static void max77693_haptic_enable(struct max77693_haptic *haptic) > > { > > + struct pwm_state pstate; > > int error; > > > > if (haptic->enabled) > > return; > > > > - error = pwm_enable(haptic->pwm_dev); > > + pwm_get_state(haptic->pwm_dev, &pstate); > > + pstate.enabled = true; > > + > > + error = pwm_apply_state(haptic->pwm_dev, &pstate); > > As I mentioned I'd rather we did not deprecate pwm_enable() and > pwm_disable() (and maybe others), as it forces us to add unnecessary > boilerplate code to the drivers. > > > if (error) { > > dev_err(haptic->dev, > > "failed to enable haptic pwm device: %d\n", error); > > @@ -188,11 +195,13 @@ static void max77693_haptic_enable(struct max77693_haptic *haptic) > > err_enable_config: > > max77693_haptic_lowsys(haptic, false); > > err_enable_lowsys: > > - pwm_disable(haptic->pwm_dev); > > + pstate.enabled = false; > > + pwm_apply_state(haptic->pwm_dev, &pstate); > > } > > > > static void max77693_haptic_disable(struct max77693_haptic *haptic) > > { > > + struct pwm_state pstate; > > int error; > > > > if (!haptic->enabled) > > @@ -206,7 +215,9 @@ static void max77693_haptic_disable(struct max77693_haptic *haptic) > > if (error) > > goto err_disable_lowsys; > > > > - pwm_disable(haptic->pwm_dev); > > + pwm_get_state(haptic->pwm_dev, &pstate); > > + pstate.enabled = false; > > + pwm_apply_state(haptic->pwm_dev, &pstate); > > Same here. > > > haptic->enabled = false; > > > > return; > > -- > > 2.5.0 > > > > Thanks. > -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com