From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932931AbcDHMze (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2016 08:55:34 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:38550 "EHLO mail-wm0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932765AbcDHMz1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2016 08:55:27 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 14:55:22 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: LKML , Byungchul Park , Chris Metcalf , Thomas Gleixner , Luiz Capitulino , Christoph Lameter , "Paul E . McKenney" , Mike Galbraith , Rik van Riel , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: Optimize !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON cpu load updates Message-ID: <20160408125521.GC24956@lerouge> References: <1460077633-23431-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1460077633-23431-4-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <20160408104821.GM3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160408104821.GM3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 12:48:21PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 03:07:13AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > index 4c522a7..59a2821 100644 > > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c > > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c > > @@ -7327,8 +7327,9 @@ void __init sched_init(void) > > > > for (j = 0; j < CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX; j++) > > rq->cpu_load[j] = 0; > > - > > +#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON > > rq->last_load_update_tick = jiffies; > > +#endif > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_SMP > > rq->sd = NULL; > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c > > index 1dd864d..4618e5b 100644 > > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c > > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c > > @@ -4661,8 +4680,10 @@ static inline void cpu_load_update_nohz(struct rq *this_rq, > > > > static void cpu_load_update_periodic(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned long load) > > { > > +#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON > > /* See the mess around cpu_load_update_nohz(). */ > > this_rq->last_load_update_tick = READ_ONCE(jiffies); > > +#endif > > cpu_load_update(this_rq, load, 1); > > } > > > > Here you do the simple #ifdef, while here you make a giant mess instead > of the relatively straight forward: > > > @@ -4540,17 +4568,8 @@ static void cpu_load_update(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned long this_load, > > > > /* scale is effectively 1 << i now, and >> i divides by scale */ > > > > - old_load = this_rq->cpu_load[i]; > #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON > > - old_load = decay_load_missed(old_load, pending_updates - 1, i); > > - if (tickless_load) { > > - old_load -= decay_load_missed(tickless_load, pending_updates - 1, i); > > - /* > > - * old_load can never be a negative value because a > > - * decayed tickless_load cannot be greater than the > > - * original tickless_load. > > - */ > > - old_load += tickless_load; > > - } > #endif Ah sure, if you prefer it that way, I can do that. Thanks.