linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bsegall@google.com, pjt@google.com,
	morten.rasmussen@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched/fair: Optimize sum computation with a lookup table
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 02:07:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160412180754.GJ8697@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160412101413.GC5609@e106622-lin>

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:14:13AM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> On 12/04/16 03:12, Yuyang Du wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:41:28AM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On 11/04/16 06:36, Yuyang Du wrote:
> > > > __compute_runnable_contrib() uses a loop to compute sum, whereas a
> > > > table loopup can do it faster in a constant time.
> > > > 
> > > > The following python script can be used to generate the constants:
> > > > 
> > > > print " #:     yN_inv   yN_sum"
> > > > print "-----------------------"
> > > > y = (0.5)**(1/32.0)
> > > > x = 2**32
> > > > xx = 1024
> > > > for i in range(0, 32):
> > > > 	if i == 0:
> > > > 		x = x-1
> > > > 		xx = xx*y
> > > > 	else:
> > > > 		x = x*y
> > > > 		xx = int(xx*y + 1024*y)
> > > > 	print "%2d: %#x %8d" % (i, int(x), int(xx))
> > > > 
> > > > print " #:  sum_N32"
> > > > print "------------"
> > > > xxx = xx
> > > > for i in range(0, 11):
> > > > 	if i == 0:
> > > > 		xxx = xx
> > > > 	else:
> > > > 		xxx = xxx/2 + xx
> > > > 	print "%2d: %8d" % (i, xxx)
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks for the script, really useful. Do you think there is value in
> > > making it general? Like if we want to play with/need changing LOAD_AVG_
> > > PERIOD in the future to something different than 32.
> > 
> > i think a s/32/xx/ should work.
> >  
> > > Also, does the following assume LOAD_AVG_PERIOD == 32? And if yes, do
> > > you think there is any value in removing that assumption?
> >  
> > Like Peter said, we are heavily dependent on it already.
> 
> But I think the current code should still work if we define LOAD_AVG_
> PERIOD as, say, 16 and we use Paul's program to recompute the tables.
> 
> My point was about trying to keep everything related to LOAD_AVG_PERIOD
> and not start assuming it is 32. I'm not saying your changes assume
> that, I was asking if they do.

Oh, then my changes do not make more or less dependency. The entire avg thing
should only have two seeds (and all others depend on them):

(1) a period is 1024*1024ns
(2) a half-life is 32 periods

I'll check if there is anything hard-coded other than the two.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-13  1:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-10 22:36 [PATCH 0/4] Optimize sched avg computation and implement flat util hierarchy Yuyang Du
2016-04-10 22:36 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched/fair: Optimize sum computation with a lookup table Yuyang Du
2016-04-11  9:08   ` Vincent Guittot
2016-04-11 10:41   ` Juri Lelli
2016-04-11 19:12     ` Yuyang Du
2016-04-12 10:14       ` Juri Lelli
2016-04-12 18:07         ` Yuyang Du [this message]
2016-04-13  9:11           ` Juri Lelli
2016-04-11 16:59   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-04-11 19:17     ` Yuyang Du
2016-04-12 14:19       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-12 18:12         ` Yuyang Du
2016-04-11 23:21     ` Joe Perches
2016-04-12 12:02       ` Juri Lelli
2016-04-11 23:07   ` Joe Perches
2016-04-10 22:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched/fair: Drop out incomplete current period when sched averages accrue Yuyang Du
2016-04-11  9:08   ` Vincent Guittot
2016-04-11 19:41     ` Yuyang Du
2016-04-12 11:56       ` Vincent Guittot
2016-04-12 21:09         ` Yuyang Du
2016-04-13 11:11           ` Vincent Guittot
2016-04-12 12:02   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-04-12 20:14     ` Yuyang Du
2016-04-13  4:04       ` Joe Perches
2016-04-13  8:40       ` Morten Rasmussen
2016-04-13 15:13   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-04-13 15:28     ` Vincent Guittot
2016-04-13 16:20       ` Vincent Guittot
2016-04-13 18:44       ` Yuyang Du
2016-04-14 12:52         ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-04-14 20:05           ` Yuyang Du
2016-04-18 17:59             ` Yuyang Du
2016-04-10 22:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched/fair: Modify accumulated sums for load/util averages Yuyang Du
2016-04-11 17:14   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-04-10 22:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched/fair: Implement flat hierarchical structure for util_avg Yuyang Du
2016-04-11 12:29   ` Vincent Guittot
2016-04-11 20:37     ` Yuyang Du
2016-04-13 11:27       ` Vincent Guittot
2016-04-13 18:20         ` Yuyang Du

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160412180754.GJ8697@intel.com \
    --to=yuyang.du@intel.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).