linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Question] refcount of DT node
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 09:48:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160414084849.GT19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNATFUW2KXUpFas6C_SJ0C7Qb1DWU0njLg-FCYciK2U6Oag@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 04:47:57PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi experts.
> 
> My understanding of refcount of DT node is poor.

The message from DT people is... don't worry about DT node refcounting.
Do whatever you want with it, they don't care whether you have correct
refcounting or not.

The background behind that is that I've tried to fix the refcounting,
and even had the coccinelle people generate some stuff to work on this
issue, but DT people's attitude towards it is "don't bother".

So yes, people may get it wrong, but it seems it's something that DT
people want ignored.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-14  8:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-14  7:47 [Question] refcount of DT node Masahiro Yamada
2016-04-14  8:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2016-04-14  9:59   ` Mark Rutland
2016-04-14 10:02     ` Pantelis Antoniou
2016-04-14 16:10       ` Frank Rowand
2016-04-14 17:02       ` Rob Herring
2016-04-14 18:38     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-04-16 15:02       ` Masahiro Yamada
2016-04-14 10:10 ` Mark Rutland
2016-04-14 10:40   ` Pantelis Antoniou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160414084849.GT19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).