From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752626AbcDOQXq (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:23:46 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:48184 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751545AbcDOQXn (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:23:43 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 09:23:42 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Sudeep Holla Cc: Vladimir Murzin , arnd@arndb.de, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de, liviu.dudau@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, peter@hurleysoftware.com, pawel.moll@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Support for Cortex-M Prototyping System Message-ID: <20160415162342.GC25094@kroah.com> References: <1459519381-34441-1-git-send-email-vladimir.murzin@arm.com> <570F593D.6040809@arm.com> <20160414192540.GD20512@kroah.com> <5710ABC4.5070505@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5710ABC4.5070505@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 09:52:20AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > On 14/04/16 20:25, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 09:47:57AM +0100, Vladimir Murzin wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 01/04/16 15:02, Vladimir Murzin wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > This patch series provides the basic support for running ucLinux on V2M-MPS2 > > > > platform. > > > > > > > > With these patches applied ucLinux can be run on both HW and FVP models > > > > with Cortex-M3/M4/M7 configurations. > > > > > > Any objection to get it merged? > > > > > > Sudeep Holla noticed that there is merge conflict against linux-next > > > with PIC32 uart (Makefile and serial_core.h), so should I provide > > > conflict resolution or do rebase on someone's branch? > > > > > > Anyway, I'd be glad to know how it should be processed further? > > > > I have no objection to the tty/serial changes, so if this all goes > > through the arm-soc tree, that's fine with me. > > > > Thanks Greg, can I take this as Ack ? arm-soc guys might expect to see > that tag :) Sorry, yes: Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman