From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753987AbcDSLXc (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2016 07:23:32 -0400 Received: from mx08-00178001.pphosted.com ([91.207.212.93]:43908 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753398AbcDSLW4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2016 07:22:56 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 19:22:17 +0800 From: Denis Ciocca To: Crestez Dan Leonard CC: Lucas De Marchi , Jonathan Cameron , "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , Giuseppe BARBA , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Daniel Baluta , Peter Rosin , Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [RFC] iio: st: Add lsm9ds0 support for gyro accel and magny Message-ID: <20160419112217.GC9712@beicxl1122> References: <2bcce23e64d53f542a9436b11509b107d63cb8dc.1460573498.git.leonard.crestez@intel.com> <57137732.40507@kernel.org> <20160418060742.GA2981@beicxl1122> <5714B609.4020502@intel.com> <57153AC3.9020603@kernel.org> <57160E37.2040401@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <57160E37.2040401@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2016-04-19_09:,, signatures=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Leonard, On |19 Apr 16 @ 12:53|, Crestez Dan Leonard wrote: > On 04/19/2016 08:10 AM, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > >> On 18/04/16 11:25, Crestez Dan Leonard wrote: > >>> On 04/18/2016 09:07 AM, Denis Ciocca wrote: > >>> Then st_combo_* implementation functions would forward to st_magn_* or > >>> st_accel_* depending on chan->type. Does this make sense? > >> Perhaps. If you have a short term need for this perhaps Denis and you can > >> work together to speed up what he has 'in the works' for this? > >> No point in duplicating work! > >> > >> The gyro element can go forward separately in the meantime. > > > > Isn't LSM9DS0 just a package of LSM303D and L3GD20 that could reuse > > the drivers already present? > > That doesn't seem to be mentioned in the datasheets but I guessed that > is a repacking of existing devices. There is no such info. But since whoIam and register map is same, we can use same table of l3gd20. > > The gyro part of the patch only adds IDs. It's ~10 lines spread around > many files. > > For accel/magn parts there is a WHOAMI different from all others present > and some registers also seem to be different. There doesn't seem to be > explicit support for "LSM303D". lsm303d is a combo device, not currently supported into ST architecture. When it will be ok, we can support in same table lsm303d and lsm9ds0 (accel & magn) if I remember corretly (since are sharing ID and register map). > > I have no urgent need for this to work, I'm fine with waiting some time > for st_sensor combo support. That's great. I will keep you updated. > > I can repost the gyro and accel+magn parts separately. But it's not > clear that supporting an accel-only device would still make sense once > combo support is available. So maybe I should just repost the gyro patch > adding IDs? I think we can proceed with gyro patch. So, you can provide a patch that adds lsm9ds0_gyro part. Thanks, Denis > > Regards, > Leonard > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html