From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754114AbcDVN5W (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Apr 2016 09:57:22 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:55898 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752942AbcDVN5U (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Apr 2016 09:57:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 15:57:18 +0200 From: Petr Mladek To: Tejun Heo Cc: Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Cyril Hrubis , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] memcg: relocate charge moving from ->attach to ->post_attach Message-ID: <20160422135718.GA19702@pathway.suse.cz> References: <20160413094216.GC5774@pathway.suse.cz> <20160413183309.GG3676@htj.duckdns.org> <20160413192313.GA30260@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20160414175055.GA6794@cmpxchg.org> <20160415191719.GK12583@htj.duckdns.org> <20160417120747.GC21757@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20160421230648.GI4775@htj.duckdns.org> <20160421230902.GJ4775@htj.duckdns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160421230902.GJ4775@htj.duckdns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu 2016-04-21 19:09:02, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > So, this ended up a lot simpler than I originally expected. I tested > it lightly and it seems to work fine. Petr, can you please test these > two patches w/o the lru drain drop patch and see whether the problem > is gone? The LTP test is running several hours without any problem with these two patches. I double checked that I did not have the lru drain drop patch. Therefore, these two patches solved the problem as well, so: Tested-by: Petr Mladek Best Regards, Petr