From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755132AbcD0Af1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2016 20:35:27 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.220.52]:33386 "EHLO mail-pa0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752287AbcD0AfW (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2016 20:35:22 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 09:36:54 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Petr Mladek Cc: Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , Russell King , Daniel Thompson , Jiri Kosina , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Sergey Senozhatsky , Chris Metcalf , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, adi-buildroot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-cris-kernel@axis.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Cleaning printk stuff in NMI context Message-ID: <20160427003654.GB4782@swordfish> References: <1461239325-22779-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1461239325-22779-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On (04/21/16 13:48), Petr Mladek wrote: > v5 adds changes suggested by Sergey Senozhatsky. It should not longer > conflict with his async printk patchset. passes my tests. (apart from that cosmetic-nano-nit) the series looks good to me Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky -ss