From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753372AbcD0O6I (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:58:08 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:45203 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752784AbcD0O6F (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:58:05 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:58:01 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Tom Lendacky , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Arnd Bergmann , Jonathan Corbet , Matt Fleming , Joerg Roedel , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Paolo Bonzini , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrey Ryabinin , Alexander Potapenko , Thomas Gleixner , Dmitry Vyukov Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/18] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (AMD) Message-ID: <20160427145801.GA5895@amd> References: <20160426225553.13567.19459.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.net> <20160322130058.GA16528@xo-6d-61-c0.localdomain> <20160427140520.GG21011@pd.tnic> <20160427143045.GA4718@amd> <20160427143951.GH21011@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160427143951.GH21011@pd.tnic> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed 2016-04-27 16:39:51, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 04:30:45PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > That does not answer the question. "Why would I want SME on my > > system?". > > Because your question wasn't formulated properly. Here's some text from > the 0th mail which you could've found on your own: > "The following links provide additional detail: > > AMD Memory Encryption whitepaper: > http://amd-dev.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wordpress/media/2013/12/AMD_Memory_Encryption_Whitepaper_v7-Public.pdf > " > > > And that answer should go to Documentation/. > > It will. Yeah? So why not include it in reply instead of flaming me? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html