Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Patches to allow consistent mmc / mmcblk numbering w/ device tree - Russell King

From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
	Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>,
	"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>,
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
	<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
	devicetree-spec@vger.kernel.org,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@nvidia.com>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Grant Grundler <grundler@chromium.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	"Luca Porzio (lporzio)" <lporzio@micron.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>,
	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	zhonghui.fu@linux.intel.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Patches to allow consistent mmc / mmcblk numbering w/ device tree
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 23:16:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160429221606.GE19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=VgQX_EVhUUCugzv+CZqjzTS8LwyeU5419aX9FbDnWJDg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:56:38PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Russell,
> 
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:39:35PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > [didn't read most of your reply]
> >
> >> Really I just reposted it several times because I notice that you seem
> >> to ignore many points of my emails.  I was really hoping to get you to
> >> address this point.  I notice that you still didn't.  Either you are
> >> just trying to annoy me, or you don't have an answer to how my patch
> >> series hurts you.
> >
> > I don't see you treating Rob with the same contempt that you have
> > treated me in this thread, despite Rob and myself both telling you
> > basically the same thing.
> 
> Rob wrote a nice thoughtful reply and I tried to give a nice
> thoughtful reply back to him.  He raised some good points and I raised
> some good points back to him.  I look forward to his future thoughts
> on the topic.

Meanwhile, I've pointed out that you appear to be coming from a
misunderstanding (that's certainly clear because you believed
initially that grub did something it doesn't), showing that the
"problem" you have is no different from the majority of other
systems running Linux, and you treat me with contempt.

What are you going to do to resolve this?

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.