From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751454AbcEKGzo (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 May 2016 02:55:44 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:59312 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751271AbcEKGzn (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 May 2016 02:55:43 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 08:55:27 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , netdev , "David S. Miller" , Jiri Pirko , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Alexander Duyck , Tom Herbert , Ingo Molnar , Rik van Riel , LKML Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] net: threadable napi poll loop Message-ID: <20160511065527.GD3193@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1462890590.23934.68.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <90f3db8c-c30c-b204-576a-454939ac93ce@stressinduktion.org> <94f323a9-515e-4d75-cac8-ef0214f0499e@stressinduktion.org> <1462920697.23934.113.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1462920697.23934.113.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 03:51:37PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c > index 17caf4b63342..22463217e3cf 100644 > --- a/kernel/softirq.c > +++ b/kernel/softirq.c > @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(irq_stat); > static struct softirq_action softirq_vec[NR_SOFTIRQS] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp; > > DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct task_struct *, ksoftirqd); > +DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, ksoftirqd_scheduled); > > const char * const softirq_to_name[NR_SOFTIRQS] = { > "HI", "TIMER", "NET_TX", "NET_RX", "BLOCK", "BLOCK_IOPOLL", > @@ -73,8 +74,10 @@ static void wakeup_softirqd(void) > /* Interrupts are disabled: no need to stop preemption */ > struct task_struct *tsk = __this_cpu_read(ksoftirqd); > > - if (tsk && tsk->state != TASK_RUNNING) > + if (tsk && tsk->state != TASK_RUNNING) { > + __this_cpu_write(ksoftirqd_scheduled, true); > wake_up_process(tsk); Since we're already looking at tsk->state, and the wake_up_process() ensures the thing becomes TASK_RUNNING, you could add: static inline bool ksoftirqd_running(void) { return __this_cpu_read(ksoftirqd)->state == TASK_RUNNING; } > + } > } > > /* > @@ -162,7 +165,9 @@ void __local_bh_enable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt) > */ > preempt_count_sub(cnt - 1); > > - if (unlikely(!in_interrupt() && local_softirq_pending())) { > + if (unlikely(!in_interrupt() && > + local_softirq_pending() && > + !__this_cpu_read(ksoftirqd_scheduled))) { And use it here, > /* > * Run softirq if any pending. And do it in its own stack > * as we may be calling this deep in a task call stack already. > @@ -340,6 +345,9 @@ void irq_enter(void) > > static inline void invoke_softirq(void) > { > + if (__this_cpu_read(ksoftirqd_scheduled)) and here. > + return; > + > if (!force_irqthreads) { > #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_IRQ_EXIT_ON_IRQ_STACK > /* > @@ -660,6 +668,8 @@ static void run_ksoftirqd(unsigned int cpu) > * in the task stack here. > */ > __do_softirq(); > + if (!local_softirq_pending()) > + __this_cpu_write(ksoftirqd_scheduled, false); And avoid twiddling the new variable which only seems to mirror tsk->state. > local_irq_enable(); > cond_resched_rcu_qs(); > return; > >