From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751963AbcEPWlF (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 May 2016 18:41:05 -0400 Received: from relay1.sgi.com ([192.48.180.66]:54489 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751185AbcEPWlE (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 May 2016 18:41:04 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 17:40:58 -0500 From: Alex Thorlton To: Alex Thorlton Cc: Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Matt Fleming , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] EFI fix Message-ID: <20160516224058.GJ98477@stormcage.americas.sgi.com> References: <20160516144648.GA22999@gmail.com> <20160516202351.GH98477@stormcage.americas.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160516202351.GH98477@stormcage.americas.sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 03:23:51PM -0500, Alex Thorlton wrote: > Everything discussed above makes sense to me, and the patch looks sane. > I will apply and test it today and let you know how it works. I applied this to the latest -tip kernel and tested on both real hardware and in our simulator. Everything appears to be behaving as expected. I still need to work on the other patch in the patchset to get our callbacks working with the new EFI page tables, but I believe we have a clear path forward there, and that is (mostly) a separate issue. Thanks again for catching this mistake, Linus! - Alex