From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753230AbcERNbo (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 May 2016 09:31:44 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42849 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752533AbcERNbm (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 May 2016 09:31:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 15:31:38 +0200 From: Benjamin Tissoires To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Bastien Nocera , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Input - surface3_spi: add new driver for the Surface 3 Message-ID: <20160518133137.GE23234@mail.corp.redhat.com> References: <1463480179-11974-1-git-send-email-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> <20160517180428.GA9007@dtor-ws> <20160517191355.GD23234@mail.corp.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160517191355.GD23234@mail.corp.redhat.com> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Wed, 18 May 2016 13:31:42 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On May 17 2016 or thereabouts, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > On May 17 2016 or thereabouts, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > Hi Benjamin, > > > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:16:19PM +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > > > This is a basic driver for the Surface 3. I am not so sure it will work > > > with any firmwares as most values are encoded, but given that I only have > > > access to my current device with its firmware and I don't have the > > > datasheet, it should be OK for now. > > > > > > The Surface Pen is not supported (if it is supposed to be). I'll work on > > > this when I get one. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires > > > --- > > > Changes in v2: > > > > > > - module renamed from ntrig_spi to surface3_spi > > > - took into account Dmitry's remarks > > > - kept the retrieval of the GPIO as mandatory as otherwise the device fails to work > > > > > > Changes in v3: > > > > > > - asm include put at the end > > > - used proper types in struct surfacae3_ts_data_finger > > > - dropped temps in surface3_spi_report_touch() > > > - inlined surface3_spi_request_irq() > > > - detect IRQ type (falling/rising) depending on the gpiod active low parameter > > > > I do not think that this should be done in the driver. The device either > > has interrupt descriptor or GpioInt decriptor in DSDT and SPI core/ACPI > > should do the right thing and configure GPIO as input and set interrupt > > polarity accordingly, so when you do request_threaded_irq() you only > > need to specify IRQF_ONESHOT. > > > > See drivers/spi/spi.c - in case there is no interrupt specified we call > > acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(). Do you see it called in your case? Or your DSDT > > has interrupt for the touchscreen device and acpi_spi_add_resource() and > > acpi_dev_resource_interrupt() are called? You need to trace it and > > figure out if there is an issue there with setting up interrupt > > properly. > > Looks like I need to push further the tests. From what I can see, using > just IRQF_ONESHOT is not sufficient enough and I need to add the trigger > falling manually (thus this way of doing). > I think I finally got it: I traced irq_get_irq_type() just before calling devm_request_threaded_irq(), and the trigger flag was properly set. The thing is that the IRQ was triggered only if I actually set the trigger in the flag (using "IRQF_ONESHOT | irq_get_irq_type(spi->irq)" was making it working). And the final problem I had was that I was requesting the gpiod for the interrupt. I think this just messed up the gpiochip configuration and the request irq needs to reset it properly. So removing a bunch of lines of code solves it :) (I know, you already told me to remove it in v1, but it did not work at that time :-P ). v4 on its way after a few more tests. Cheers, Benjamin