From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756086AbcETPW6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 May 2016 11:22:58 -0400 Received: from mail-ig0-f173.google.com ([209.85.213.173]:36486 "EHLO mail-ig0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752892AbcETPW4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 May 2016 11:22:56 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 08:22:44 -0700 From: Tejun Heo To: Aleksa Sarai Cc: Li Zefan , Johannes Weiner , James Bottomley , Aleksa Sarai , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dev@opencontainers.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] cgroup: allow management of subtrees by new cgroup namespaces Message-ID: <20160520152244.GB5632@htj.duckdns.org> References: <1463196000-13900-1-git-send-email-asarai@suse.de> <573F23D0.2030500@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <573F23D0.2030500@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:48:48AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote: > Are there any comments on this version of the patchset? I thought we had > reached an agreement that the underlying feature (allowing a process to > manage its own cgroups) was useful. Is there a better way of solving this > problem, that I don't know of? I still don't see why this is necessary. Delegation is done through chmodding. There's no reason to deviate for namespaces. Thanks. -- tejun