linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@ettus.com>
Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, computersforpeace@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] doc: bindings: Add bindings documentation for mtd otp nvmem
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 10:04:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160526100406.783c6f2d@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464211607-8843-2-git-send-email-moritz.fischer@ettus.com>

Hi Moritz,

On Wed, 25 May 2016 14:26:46 -0700
Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@ettus.com> wrote:

> This commit adds documentation describing the bindings for
> exposing mtd flash otp regions as nvmem providers via devicetree.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@ettus.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/otp-nvmem.txt          | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/otp-nvmem.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/otp-nvmem.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/otp-nvmem.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..a83a7da
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/otp-nvmem.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
> +Representing OTP regions in devicetree
> +
> +OTP regions can be represented by sub-nodes of an mtd device.
> +
> +The partition table should be a subnode of the mtd node and should be names
> +'otp-partitions'. This node should have the following property:
> +
> +- compatible: (required) must be 'fixed-partitions'
> +
> +OTP regions are then defined in subnodes of the partitions node.
> +
> +Required properties for OTP regions:
> +- reg: The region's offset and size within the mtd device
> +
> +Optional properties:
> +- label: The label / name for this region. If ommited, the label is taken
> +  from the node name (excluding the unit address).
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +flash@0 {
> +	partitions {
> +		compatible = "fixed-partitions";
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +		#size-cells = <1>;
> +
> +		partition@0 {
> +			label = "uboot-spl";
> +			reg = <0x0 0xe0000>;
> +		};
> +		partition@1 {
> +			label = "uboot-env";
> +			reg = <0xe0000 0x20000>;
> +		};
> +		partition@2 {
> +			label = "uboot";
> +			reg = <0x100000 0x100000>;
> +		};
> +	};
> +
> +	otp-partitions {
> +		compatible = "fixed-partitions";
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +		#size-cells = <1>;
> +
> +		region@0 {
> +			label = "factory-data";
> +			reg = <0x0 0x40>;
> +
> +			#address-cells = <0x1>;
> +			#size-cells = <0x1>;
> +
> +			product: nvmem@0 {
> +				reg = <0x0 0x2>;
> +			};
> +
> +			revision: nvmem@3 {
> +				reg = <0x3 0x2>;
> +			};
> +		};
> +	};
> +}

I think the MTD partition -> nvmem connection could benefit to non-OTP
partitions too.

So, how about defining the nvmem regions under the partition nodes,
like that:

flash@0 {
	partitions {
		compatible = "fixed-partitions";
		#address-cells = <1>;
		#size-cells = <1>;

		partition@0 {
			label = "uboot-spl";
			reg = <0x0 0xe0000>;
		};

		/* ... */

		partition@X{
			label = "factory-data-part";
			reg = <0x200000 0x100000>;
			#address-cells = <1>;
			#size-cells = <1>;

			product: nvmem@0 {
				reg = <0x0 0x2>;
			};

			revision: nvmem@3 {
				reg = <0x3 0x2>;
			};
		};
	};

	otp-partitions {
		compatible = "fixed-partitions";
		#address-cells = <1>;
		#size-cells = <1>;

		partition@X{
			label = "factory-data-part";
			reg = <0x0 0x40>;
			#address-cells = <1>;
			#size-cells = <1>;

			product: nvmem@0 {
				reg = <0x0 0x2>;
			};

			revision: nvmem@3 {
				reg = <0x3 0x2>;
			};
		};
	};
};

I know this requires changing the implementation to select the
appropriate nvmem wrapper to use depending on whether we're interfacing
with an OTP area or a regular one, but that should be doable.

Regards,

Boris

-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-26  8:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-25 21:26 [RFC/PATCH 0/2] Adding support to expose mtd flash otp regions via nvmem Moritz Fischer
2016-05-25 21:26 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/2] doc: bindings: Add bindings documentation for mtd otp nvmem Moritz Fischer
2016-05-26  8:04   ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2016-05-26 17:28     ` Moritz Fischer
2016-05-27 13:26       ` Boris Brezillon
2016-05-25 21:26 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/2] mtd: otp: Expose mtd flash otp regions as nvmem providers Moritz Fischer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160526100406.783c6f2d@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=moritz.fischer@ettus.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).