From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, wangnan0@huawei.com,
jpoimboe@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com, eranian@google.com,
namhyung@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com,
tumanova@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kan.liang@intel.com,
penberg@kernel.org, dsahern@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/11] perf tools: Move unwind__prepare_access from thread_new into thread__insert_map
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 10:52:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160530085227.GA25607@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464436800-39860-5-git-send-email-hekuang@huawei.com>
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 11:59:53AM +0000, He Kuang wrote:
> For determine the libunwind methods to use, we should get the
> 32bit/64bit information from maps of a thread. When a thread is newly
> created, the information is not prepared. This patch moves
> unwind__prepare_access() into thread__insert_map() so we can get the
> information we need from maps.
>
> Signed-off-by: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/thread.c | 7 ++-----
> tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind.c | 7 +++----
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/thread.c b/tools/perf/util/thread.c
> index 6d3900c..045477d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/thread.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/thread.c
> @@ -43,11 +43,6 @@ struct thread *thread__new(pid_t pid, pid_t tid)
> thread->cpu = -1;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&thread->comm_list);
>
> - register_local_unwind_libunwind_ops(thread);
> -
> - if (unwind__prepare_access(thread) < 0)
> - goto err_thread;
> -
> comm_str = malloc(32);
> if (!comm_str)
> goto err_thread;
> @@ -207,6 +202,8 @@ void thread__insert_map(struct thread *thread, struct map *map)
> {
> map_groups__fixup_overlappings(thread->mg, map, stderr);
> map_groups__insert(thread->mg, map);
> +
> + unwind__prepare_access(thread);
so thread__insert_map does not return value,
I think we should change it now when it calls
unwind__prepare_access
I was also thinking to keepcall unwind__prepare_access
separatelly but this function seems to fit better
thanks,
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-30 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-28 11:59 [PATCH v6 00/11] Add support for remote unwind He Kuang
2016-05-28 11:59 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] perf tools: Use LIBUNWIND_DIR for remote libunwind feature check He Kuang
2016-05-28 11:59 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] perf tools: Decouple thread->address_space on libunwind He Kuang
2016-05-28 11:59 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] perf tools: Introducing struct unwind_libunwind_ops for local unwind He Kuang
2016-05-30 8:53 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-05-28 11:59 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] perf tools: Move unwind__prepare_access from thread_new into thread__insert_map He Kuang
2016-05-30 8:52 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2016-05-28 11:59 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] perf tools: Separate local/remote libunwind config He Kuang
2016-05-30 8:52 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-05-28 11:59 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] perf tools: Extract local libunwind code out of unwind-libunwind.c He Kuang
2016-05-28 12:10 ` Wangnan (F)
2016-05-30 3:22 ` [PATCH v6 06/11 1 update 1/2] perf tools: Rename unwind-libunwind.c to unwind-libunwind-local.c He Kuang
2016-05-30 3:22 ` [PATCH v6 06/11 1 update 2/2] perf tools: Extract common API out of unwind-libunwind-local.c He Kuang
2016-05-30 3:24 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] perf tools: Extract local libunwind code out of unwind-libunwind.c Hekuang
2016-05-28 11:59 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] perf tools: Export normalize_arch() function He Kuang
2016-05-28 11:59 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] perf tools: Show warnings for unsupported cross-platform unwind He Kuang
2016-05-30 8:53 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-05-28 11:59 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] perf tools: Change fixed name of libunwind__arch_reg_id to macro He Kuang
2016-05-28 11:59 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] perf callchain: Support x86 target platform He Kuang
2016-05-30 8:52 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-05-30 8:53 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-05-30 8:53 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-05-30 9:11 ` Hekuang
2016-05-30 9:30 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-05-30 10:58 ` Hekuang
2016-05-30 14:24 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-05-28 12:00 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] perf callchain: Support aarch64 cross-platform He Kuang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160530085227.GA25607@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=hekuang@huawei.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tumanova@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).