From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752241AbcEaLO5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2016 07:14:57 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f175.google.com ([209.85.192.175]:36674 "EHLO mail-pf0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750740AbcEaLOz (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2016 07:14:55 -0400 Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 16:44:51 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Steve Muckle Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Guittot , Morten Rasmussen , Dietmar Eggemann , Juri Lelli , Patrick Bellasi , Michael Turquette Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] cpufreq: add resolve_freq driver callback Message-ID: <20160531111451.GF9463@vireshk-i7> References: <1464231181-30741-1-git-send-email-smuckle@linaro.org> <1464231181-30741-2-git-send-email-smuckle@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1464231181-30741-2-git-send-email-smuckle@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 25-05-16, 19:52, Steve Muckle wrote: > +unsigned int cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, > + unsigned int target_freq) > +{ > + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table; > + int index, retval; > + > + clamp_val(target_freq, policy->min, policy->max); Rafael will kill me for this, as I have fallen into the same trap and copied your *incorrect* code :( This is a useless statement unless you do: target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, policy->min, policy->max); -- viresh