From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932417AbcFBIy3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2016 04:54:29 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:55318 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932233AbcFBIy2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2016 04:54:28 -0400 Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 10:54:25 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: David Carrillo-Cisneros Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "x86@kernel.org" , Ingo Molnar , "Yan, Zheng" , Andi Kleen , Kan Liang , Stephane Eranian Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf/x86/intel: fix for MSR_LAST_BRANCH_FROM_x quirk when no TSX Message-ID: <20160602085425.GT3193@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1464835323-33872-1-git-send-email-davidcc@google.com> <1464835323-33872-3-git-send-email-davidcc@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1464835323-33872-3-git-send-email-davidcc@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 07:42:02PM -0700, David Carrillo-Cisneros wrote: > @@ -536,6 +597,7 @@ static int intel_pmu_setup_sw_lbr_filter(struct perf_event *event) > u64 br_type = event->attr.branch_sample_type; > int mask = 0; > > + > if (br_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER) > mask |= X86_BR_USER; > Do we really need this extra whitespace?