On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:47:01PM +0800, Xing Zheng wrote:
> On 2016年06月07日 20:06, Mark Brown wrote:

> > OK, then the original name probably makes some sense though really
> > that's such an unusual design that just naming it after the specific
> > board might be better, it's not likely to see any reuse I'd guess.

> There are not only one type of board with this audio connection, so I think
> we don't need to add specific board name.

I imagine they're all variants on a single reference design though?  The
name is unweildy.