linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Cc: linux-i2c <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
	GregKH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 00/14] eeprom: at24: driver rework and at24cs/at24mac support
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 10:45:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160608084547.GJ1521@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMpxmJWVjtNPZGj-PV4rASdqVcCex22Jsu2cqG_Lom9LvGrOgw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 605 bytes --]


> sorry for that. I always resend after a week without response - just
> as suggested in Documentation/SubmittingPatches.

Wow, do I really have to tell you these things?

* It doesn't suggest to do that. It suggests to wait *a minimum* a week if
  you yourself considered doing that.

* A ping is more lightweight than resending 14 patches

* You *know* the lag in the i2c patch review. How should a reference to
  SubmittingPatches help the situation?

Needless to say, I could have reviewed a patch now instead of uncovering
wrong/sloppy readings of SubmittingPatches which I don't want to spread :(


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-08  8:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-06  8:48 [RESEND PATCH 00/14] eeprom: at24: driver rework and at24cs/at24mac support Bartosz Golaszewski
2016-06-06  8:48 ` [RESEND PATCH 01/14] eeprom: at24: improve the device_id table readability Bartosz Golaszewski
2016-06-06  8:48 ` [RESEND PATCH 02/14] eeprom: at24: move at24_read() below at24_eeprom_write() Bartosz Golaszewski
2016-06-06  8:48 ` [RESEND PATCH 03/14] eeprom: at24: coding style fixes Bartosz Golaszewski
2016-06-06  8:48 ` [RESEND PATCH 04/14] eeprom: at24: call read/write functions via function pointers Bartosz Golaszewski
2016-06-06  8:48 ` [RESEND PATCH 05/14] eeprom: at24: hide the read/write loop behind a macro Bartosz Golaszewski
2016-07-15 12:24   ` Wolfram Sang
2016-07-15 12:49     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2016-07-15 15:03       ` Wolfram Sang
2016-07-16  4:56         ` Wolfram Sang
2016-07-16 19:25           ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2016-07-17 18:00             ` Wolfram Sang
2016-06-06  8:48 ` [RESEND PATCH 06/14] eeprom: at24: split at24_eeprom_read() into specialized functions Bartosz Golaszewski
2016-06-06  8:48 ` [RESEND PATCH 07/14] eeprom: at24: split at24_eeprom_write() " Bartosz Golaszewski
2016-06-06  8:48 ` [RESEND PATCH 08/14] eeprom: at24: platform_data: use BIT() macro Bartosz Golaszewski
2016-06-06  8:48 ` [RESEND PATCH 09/14] eeprom: at24: platform_data: add serial number flag Bartosz Golaszewski
2016-06-06  8:48 ` [RESEND PATCH 10/14] eeprom: at24: support reading the serial number Bartosz Golaszewski
2016-06-06  8:48 ` [RESEND PATCH 11/14] eeprom: at24: add the at24cs series to the list of supported devices Bartosz Golaszewski
2016-07-15  6:30   ` Wolfram Sang
2016-07-15  8:54     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2016-06-06  8:48 ` [RESEND PATCH 12/14] eeprom: at24: platform_data: add at24mac series flag Bartosz Golaszewski
2016-06-06  8:48 ` [RESEND PATCH 13/14] eeprom: at24: add support for at24mac series Bartosz Golaszewski
2016-06-06  8:48 ` [RESEND PATCH 14/14] eeprom: at24: add at24mac chips to the list of supported devices Bartosz Golaszewski
2016-06-06 11:13 ` [RESEND PATCH 00/14] eeprom: at24: driver rework and at24cs/at24mac support Wolfram Sang
2016-06-06 13:01   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2016-06-08  8:45     ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2016-06-08  9:22       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2016-07-17 18:02 ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160608084547.GJ1521@katana \
    --to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).