linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel@stlinux.com, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: Fix mmc_select_hs200() regression in v4.7-rc.
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 11:20:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160608102044.GB25004@griffinp-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon-2nd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFrvuDrNwUmZQw2UN+Ke-DFyW9eCNc+nhQ7cmpYWdn+rMw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Ulf,

On Tue, 07 Jun 2016, Ulf Hansson wrote:

> On 7 June 2016 at 15:57, Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org> wrote:
> > Hi Lee,
> >
> > On Tue, 07 Jun 2016, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 07 Jun 2016, Peter Griffin wrote:
> >>
> >> > mmc_select_bus_width() returns bus width (4 or 8) on success or
> >> > zero if unsupported. If bus width is set successfully we then wish
> >> > to switch to HS200 mode.
> >> >
> >> > This avoids the following error message in v4.70-rc2
> >> >
> >> > [    2.523674] mmc0: mmc_select_hs200 failed, error 3
> >> > [    2.528516] mmc0: error 3 whilst initialising MMC card
> >> >
> >> > With this patch card is enumerated correctly
> >> >
> >> > [    2.468065] mmc0: new HS200 MMC card at address 0001
> >> > [    2.468335] mmcblk0: mmc0:0001 P1XXXX 7.20 GiB
> >> > [    2.468441] mmcblk0boot0: mmc0:0001 P1XXXX partition 1 2.00 MiB
> >> > [    2.468552] mmcblk0boot1: mmc0:0001 P1XXXX partition 2 2.00 MiB
> >> > [    2.468651] mmcblk0rpmb: mmc0:0001 P1XXXX partition 3 128 KiB
> >> > [    2.469269]  mmcblk0: p1
> >> >
> >> > Fixes: 287980e (remove lots of IS_ERR_VALUE abuses)
> >> > Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org>
> >> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >> > ---
> >> >  drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 4 ++--
> >> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> >> > index c984321..aafb73d 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> >> > @@ -1276,7 +1276,7 @@ static int mmc_select_hs200(struct mmc_card *card)
> >> >      * switch to HS200 mode if bus width is set successfully.
> >> >      */
> >> >     err = mmc_select_bus_width(card);
> >> > -   if (!err) {
> >> > +   if (err > 0) {
> >> >             val = EXT_CSD_TIMING_HS200 |
> >> >                   card->drive_strength << EXT_CSD_DRV_STR_SHIFT;
> >> >             err = __mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
> >> > @@ -1583,7 +1583,7 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr,
> >> >     } else if (mmc_card_hs(card)) {
> >> >             /* Select the desired bus width optionally */
> >> >             err = mmc_select_bus_width(card);
> >> > -           if (!err) {
> >> > +           if (err > 0) {
> >> >                     err = mmc_select_hs_ddr(card);
> >> >                     if (err)
> >> >                             goto free_card;
> >>
> >> Looks like this has already been 'fixed' in -rc2.
> >
> > Ah, it seems I was on -rc1, not -rc2
> >
> >>
> >> Although, this patch does not work for me.
> >>     mmc: fix mmc mode selection for HS-DDR and higher
> >>
> >>     When IS_ERR_VALUE was removed from the mmc core code, it was replaced
> >>     with a simple not-zero check. This does not work, as the value checked
> >>     is the return value for mmc_select_bus_width, which returns the set
> >>     bit width on success. This made eMMC modes higher than HS-DDR unusable.
> >>
> >>     Fix this by checking for a positive return value instead.
> >>
> >>     Fixes: 287980e49ffc ("remove lots of IS_ERR_VALUE abuses")
> >>     Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >>     Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> >>     Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> >>     Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> >>     Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
> >>     Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
> >>     Tested-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
> >>     Tested-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> >>     Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> >> index c984321..5d438ad 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> >> @@ -1276,7 +1276,7 @@ static int mmc_select_hs200(struct mmc_card *card)
> >>        * switch to HS200 mode if bus width is set successfully.
> >>        */
> >>       err = mmc_select_bus_width(card);
> >> -     if (!err) {
> >> +     if (err >= 0) {
> >
> >
> > This patch looks wrong to me, as if zero is returned by mmc_select_bus_width() it
> > means setting the bus width failed, and you most likely don't want to switch to
> > hs200 mode.
> >
> > Ulf - what is your opinion?
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Peter.>
> 
> The commit above (mmc: fix mmc mode selection for HS-DDR and higher),
> simply restored the old behaviour and that was sufficient to solve the
> regressions.
> 
> Nevertheless I agree, that if mmc_select_bus_width() returns 0, that
> should likely mean that we shouldn't try to switch to hs200. If we
> want to change that, let's do that in a separate patch on top.

OK, I will send a v2 patch in a moment.

> So, do you see a problem in rc2?

No, despite what the commit message says, I wrote & tested the patch on
v4.7-rc1. A stock v4.7-rc2 enumerates the card correctly on my STi platform.

I think my patch is now only useful if setting the bus width were to fail.

regards,

Peter.

      reply	other threads:[~2016-06-08 10:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-07 13:02 [PATCH] mmc: core: Fix mmc_select_hs200() regression in v4.7-rc Peter Griffin
2016-06-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2016-06-07 13:57   ` Peter Griffin
2016-06-07 21:58     ` Ulf Hansson
2016-06-08 10:20       ` Peter Griffin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160608102044.GB25004@griffinp-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon-2nd \
    --to=peter.griffin@linaro.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=kernel@stlinux.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).