From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1425182AbcFHMfU (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 8 Jun 2016 08:35:20 -0400
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:58258 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1161715AbcFHMfS (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 8 Jun 2016 08:35:18 -0400
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 14:35:07 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc: spinlock: Fix spin_unlock_wait()
Message-ID: <20160608123507.GR30154@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <1465213340.2658.1.camel@ellerman.id.au>
 <20160606115655.GD30909@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <1465215445.2658.4.camel@ellerman.id.au>
 <20160606144659.GG30909@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <1465384845.13854.7.camel@ellerman.id.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1465384845.13854.7.camel@ellerman.id.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:20:45PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 16:46 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:17:25PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 13:56 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 09:42:20PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Why the move to in-line this implementation? It looks like a fairly big
> > > > function.
> > > 
> > > I agree it's not pretty.
> > 
> > > I'm not beholden to v3 though if you hate it.
> > 
> > I don't mind; its just that I am in a similar boat with qspinlock and
> > chose the other option. So I just figured I'd ask :-)
> 
> OK. I'll go with inline and we'll see which version gets "cleaned-up" by a
> janitor first ;)

Ok; what tree does this go in? I have this dependent series which I'd
like to get sorted and merged somewhere.