From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756001AbcFHRo3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2016 13:44:29 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:51070 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755399AbcFHRoZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2016 13:44:25 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 18:44:18 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: "Opensource [Steve Twiss]" Cc: LINUXKERNEL , Lee Jones , Support Opensource Message-ID: <20160608174418.GO7510@sirena.org.uk> References: <20160524081038.85F443FAAB@swsrvapps-01.diasemi.com> <20160608141911.GK7510@sirena.org.uk> <6ED8E3B22081A4459DAC7699F3695FB70173DA4272@SW-EX-MBX02.diasemi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iizV0xCA5n3lWO7D" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6ED8E3B22081A4459DAC7699F3695FB70173DA4272@SW-EX-MBX02.diasemi.com> X-Cookie: We've upped our standards, so up yours! User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:348:6:8808:fab::3 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] MAINTAINERS: Add Dialog PMIC search terms for missing documentation and header files X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --iizV0xCA5n3lWO7D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:25:30PM +0000, Opensource [Steve Twiss] wrote: > On 08 June 2016 15:19, Mark Brown wrote: > > We *really* shouldn't be blocking on my ack for trivial changes outside > > the subsystem like this though :( > There had been no reply since my first e-mail round about a month ago, so I > figured there was something wrong with the patch submission. It was the activity pattern on the patch more than anything else, and of course the merge window was in that month as well. > In future I will split up the responsibility and define the Subject line better to > remove any ambiguity. Like I say a trivial maintainers update like this really should just get applied anyway. --iizV0xCA5n3lWO7D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXWFlxAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQIaIH/RCpQNx7mHQcjHOYtR4jZEge 24o6EWER5PWG6boOKqcO99JaC34OJYHdATj7E7knNYonam2f9DvNl3efZAkpMBgk GJ089QRx7jTfEQZpY9ryijgW4bXAxtICSadefzf/07i//KgZCnz0W6/qmtWtd97G B4e1skwaJYpAyKF2Bk3zAM5V/M3Po1xNvvwa2SNq/oIO41RGHEaInGaT9M/k9NO4 KH0o5HrQLBh369g001gkTs/7OFbvbaQQHhWSym1nJPSq1ErLxtqBQswMakGHiuAb SWGFt60STT6izxniRllGe1Uvv4h8dhfsQVji3UWaWJynyV3YHv6e9Ep+IpXUCZU= =Yvqc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --iizV0xCA5n3lWO7D--