From: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>
To: Rhyland Klein <rklein@nvidia.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] power_supply: power_supply_read_temp only if use_cnt > 0
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 22:58:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160609205846.GA21947@earth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ff350fd-3ccc-088e-8392-d575a64aaefd@nvidia.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4812 bytes --]
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 11:31:37AM -0400, Rhyland Klein wrote:
> On 6/9/2016 6:05 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 06/08/2016 05:26 PM, Rhyland Klein wrote:
> >> On 6/8/2016 2:35 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> On 06/07/2016 10:26 PM, Rhyland Klein wrote:
> >>>> Change power_supply_read_temp() to use power_supply_get_property()
> >>>> so that it will check the use_cnt and ensure it is > 0. The use_cnt
> >>>> will be incremented at the end of __power_supply_register, so this
> >>>> will block to case where get_property can be called before the supply
> >>>> is fully registered. This fixes the issue show in the stack below:
> >>>>
> >>>> [ 1.452598] power_supply_read_temp+0x78/0x80
> >>>> [ 1.458680] thermal_zone_get_temp+0x5c/0x11c
> >>>> [ 1.464765] thermal_zone_device_update+0x34/0xb4
> >>>> [ 1.471195] thermal_zone_device_register+0x87c/0x8cc
> >>>> [ 1.477974] __power_supply_register+0x364/0x424
> >>>> [ 1.484317] power_supply_register_no_ws+0x10/0x18
> >>>> [ 1.490833] bq27xxx_battery_setup+0x10c/0x164
> >>>> [ 1.497003] bq27xxx_battery_i2c_probe+0xd0/0x1b0
> >>>> [ 1.503435] i2c_device_probe+0x174/0x240
> >>>> [ 1.509172] driver_probe_device+0x1fc/0x29c
> >>>> [ 1.515167] __driver_attach+0xa4/0xa8
> >>>> [ 1.520643] bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x98
> >>>> [ 1.526204] driver_attach+0x20/0x28
> >>>> [ 1.531505] bus_add_driver+0x1c8/0x22c
> >>>> [ 1.537067] driver_register+0x68/0x108
> >>>> [ 1.542630] i2c_register_driver+0x38/0x7c
> >>>> [ 1.548457] bq27xxx_battery_i2c_driver_init+0x18/0x20
> >>>> [ 1.555321] do_one_initcall+0x38/0x12c
> >>>> [ 1.560886] kernel_init_freeable+0x148/0x1ec
> >>>> [ 1.566972] kernel_init+0x10/0xfc
> >>>> [ 1.572101] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x40
> >>>>
> >>>> Also make the same change to ps_get_max_charge_cntl_limit() and
> >>>> ps_get_cur_chrage_cntl_limit() to be safe. Lastly, change the return
> >>>> value of power_supply_get_property() to -EAGAIN from -ENODEV if
> >>>> use_cnt <= 0.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fixes: 297d716f6260 ("power_supply: Change ownership from driver to core")
> >>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Rhyland Klein <rklein@nvidia.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> v3:
> >>>> - Changed calls to ->get_property() to use common
> >>>> power_supply_get_property()
> >>>> - reworded description, added "Fixes" line
> >>>> - Changed return value of power_supply_get_property() to -EAGAIN
> >>>>
> >>>> v2:
> >>>> - Added cc stable
> >>>> - changed return to -EAGAIN in case of use_cnt < 1
> >>>> - Removed WARNING
> >>>> - return value check added in additional patch:
> >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/6/706
> >>>>
> >>>> drivers/power/power_supply_core.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++----------
> >>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/power/power_supply_core.c b/drivers/power/power_supply_core.c
> >>>> index 456987c88baa..cccc630bd68e 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/power/power_supply_core.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/power/power_supply_core.c
> >>>> @@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ int power_supply_get_property(struct power_supply *psy,
> >>>> union power_supply_propval *val)
> >>>> {
> >>>> if (atomic_read(&psy->use_cnt) <= 0)
> >>>> - return -ENODEV;
> >>>> + return -EAGAIN;
> >>>
> >>> Wait, no. I was thinking of changing the return value in
> >>> power_supply_read_temp() if we really want EAGAIN:
> >>> ret = power_supply_get_property(...);
> >>> if (ret)
> >>> return -EAGAIN;
> >>>
> >>> On the other hand, here both return values look correct... the call can
> >>> be executed too early (not very common) or too late after unbinding the
> >>> driver (also kind of specific).
> >>
> >> I did have it that way, but it seemed a little weird to me, since both
> >> situations use the same condition (use_cnt <= 0) to trigger. I don't
> >> think we can differentiate, unless I missed something, so I'm not sure
> >> if it makes sense to override the return value after calling
> >> power_supply_get_property() or not.
> >>
> >> If I overrode the return value in get_temp, then assuming it was called
> >> after unbinding, it would return the wrong thing (-EAGAIN). If we want
> >> to support both EAGAIN and ENODEV, then maybe we need to use some
> >> additional check to know which to return from power_supply_get_property().
> >
> > Right, currently it is not possible to differentiate these two cases.
> > After quick look, I think the difference with EAGAIN would be only in
> > error message printed or not. It is not critical so maybe keep it with
> > ENODEV?
>
> I'm ok with that. Sebastian, are you ok with that? If so, I'll post a v4
> without the -EAGAIN change.
Yes.
-- Sebastian
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-09 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-07 20:26 [PATCH v3] power_supply: power_supply_read_temp only if use_cnt > 0 Rhyland Klein
2016-06-08 6:35 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-08 15:26 ` Rhyland Klein
2016-06-09 10:05 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-09 15:31 ` Rhyland Klein
2016-06-09 20:58 ` Sebastian Reichel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160609205846.GA21947@earth \
--to=sre@kernel.org \
--cc=dbaryshkov@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rklein@nvidia.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).