From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933470AbcFMFmF (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2016 01:42:05 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:41112 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932165AbcFMFmD (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2016 01:42:03 -0400 X-IBM-Helo: d23dlp03.au.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com X-IBM-RcptTo: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;netdev@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 11:10:59 +0530 From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: David Miller , Michael Ellerman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, matt@ozlabs.org, kda@linux-powerpc.org, paulus@samba.org, ast@fb.com, daniel@iogearbox.net, ananth@in.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] eBPF JIT for PPC64 References: <20160610.224755.1614979708956751311.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160610.224755.1614979708956751311.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 16061305-0004-0000-0000-0000016D4599 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 16061305-0005-0000-0000-000008100F74 Message-Id: <20160613054055.GV18654@naverao1-tp.localdomain> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2016-06-13_02:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1604210000 definitions=main-1606130062 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2016/06/10 10:47PM, David Miller wrote: > From: "Naveen N. Rao" > Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:02:17 +0530 > > > Please note that patch [2] is a pre-requisite for this patchset, and is > > not yet upstream. > ... > > [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2188694 > > [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.ppc.embedded/96514 > > Because of #2 I don't think I can take this directly into the networking > tree, right? > > Therefore, how would you like this to be merged? Hi David, Thanks for asking. Yes, I think it is better to take this through the powerpc tree as all the changes are contained within arch/powerpc, unless Michael Ellerman feels differently. Michael? Regards, Naveen