From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161495AbcFMSjA (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2016 14:39:00 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:57811 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161455AbcFMSiB (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2016 14:38:01 -0400 Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 20:37:59 +0200 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: Julia Lawall Cc: Wolfram Sang , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, mmarek@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH 4/4] coccicheck: add indexing enhancement options Message-ID: <20160613183759.GN11948@wotan.suse.de> References: <20160610211820.GG11948@wotan.suse.de> <20160610214357.GA1650@katana> <20160610214900.GH11948@wotan.suse.de> <20160610215126.GB1650@katana> <20160610220831.GI11948@wotan.suse.de> <20160610222521.GJ11948@wotan.suse.de> <20160611054625.GA1824@katana> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 07:54:39AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > On Sat, 11 Jun 2016, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > > > real 16m11.692s > > > user 127m50.388s > > > sys 0m2.168s > > > > That's better but not a magnitude, I wonder. > > I think that it is because the filtering that Coccinelle does already > works pretty well, and there are quite a lot of files (7514) that contain > kfree. Is there another scripts/coccinelle/ file I can use to test against to demo against glimpse/idutils/gitgrep best? Luis