linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nfsd: Always lock state exclusively.
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 11:38:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160614153808.GD25973@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465781187-824653-1-git-send-email-green@linuxhacker.ru>

On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 09:26:27PM -0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> It used to be the case that state had an rwlock that was locked for write
> by downgrades, but for read for upgrades (opens). Well, the problem is
> if there are two competing opens for the same state, they step on
> each other toes potentially leading to leaking file descriptors
> from the state structure, since access mode is a bitmap only set once.
> 
> Extend the holding region around in nfsd4_process_open2() to avoid
> racing entry into nfs4_get_vfs_file().
> Make init_open_stateid() return with locked stateid to be unlocked
> by the caller.
> 
> Now this version held up pretty well in my testing for 24 hours.
> It still does not address the situation if during one of the racing
> nfs4_get_vfs_file() calls we are getting an error from one (first?)
> of them. This is to be addressed in a separate patch after having a
> solid reproducer (potentially using some fault injection).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
> ---
>  fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  fs/nfsd/state.h     |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index f5f82e1..fa5fb5a 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -3487,6 +3487,10 @@ init_open_stateid(struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp, struct nfs4_file *fp,
>  	struct nfs4_openowner *oo = open->op_openowner;
>  	struct nfs4_ol_stateid *retstp = NULL;
>  
> +	/* We are moving these outside of the spinlocks to avoid the warnings */
> +	mutex_init(&stp->st_mutex);
> +	mutex_lock(&stp->st_mutex);
> +
>  	spin_lock(&oo->oo_owner.so_client->cl_lock);
>  	spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);
>  
> @@ -3502,13 +3506,14 @@ init_open_stateid(struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp, struct nfs4_file *fp,
>  	stp->st_access_bmap = 0;
>  	stp->st_deny_bmap = 0;
>  	stp->st_openstp = NULL;
> -	init_rwsem(&stp->st_rwsem);
>  	list_add(&stp->st_perstateowner, &oo->oo_owner.so_stateids);
>  	list_add(&stp->st_perfile, &fp->fi_stateids);
>  
>  out_unlock:
>  	spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
>  	spin_unlock(&oo->oo_owner.so_client->cl_lock);
> +	if (retstp)
> +		mutex_lock(&retstp->st_mutex);
>  	return retstp;

You're returning with both stp->st_mutex and retstp->st_mutex locked.
Did you mean to drop that first lock in the (retstp) case, or am I
missing something?

--b.

>  }
>  
> @@ -4335,32 +4340,34 @@ nfsd4_process_open2(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *current_fh, struct nf
>  	 */
>  	if (stp) {
>  		/* Stateid was found, this is an OPEN upgrade */
> -		down_read(&stp->st_rwsem);
> +		mutex_lock(&stp->st_mutex);
>  		status = nfs4_upgrade_open(rqstp, fp, current_fh, stp, open);
>  		if (status) {
> -			up_read(&stp->st_rwsem);
> +			mutex_unlock(&stp->st_mutex);
>  			goto out;
>  		}
>  	} else {
>  		stp = open->op_stp;
>  		open->op_stp = NULL;
> +		/*
> +		 * init_open_stateid() either returns a locked stateid
> +		 * it found, or initializes and locks the new one we passed in
> +		 */
>  		swapstp = init_open_stateid(stp, fp, open);
>  		if (swapstp) {
>  			nfs4_put_stid(&stp->st_stid);
>  			stp = swapstp;
> -			down_read(&stp->st_rwsem);
>  			status = nfs4_upgrade_open(rqstp, fp, current_fh,
>  						stp, open);
>  			if (status) {
> -				up_read(&stp->st_rwsem);
> +				mutex_unlock(&stp->st_mutex);
>  				goto out;
>  			}
>  			goto upgrade_out;
>  		}
> -		down_read(&stp->st_rwsem);
>  		status = nfs4_get_vfs_file(rqstp, fp, current_fh, stp, open);
>  		if (status) {
> -			up_read(&stp->st_rwsem);
> +			mutex_unlock(&stp->st_mutex);
>  			release_open_stateid(stp);
>  			goto out;
>  		}
> @@ -4372,7 +4379,7 @@ nfsd4_process_open2(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *current_fh, struct nf
>  	}
>  upgrade_out:
>  	nfs4_inc_and_copy_stateid(&open->op_stateid, &stp->st_stid);
> -	up_read(&stp->st_rwsem);
> +	mutex_unlock(&stp->st_mutex);
>  
>  	if (nfsd4_has_session(&resp->cstate)) {
>  		if (open->op_deleg_want & NFS4_SHARE_WANT_NO_DELEG) {
> @@ -4977,12 +4984,12 @@ static __be32 nfs4_seqid_op_checks(struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, stateid_
>  		 * revoked delegations are kept only for free_stateid.
>  		 */
>  		return nfserr_bad_stateid;
> -	down_write(&stp->st_rwsem);
> +	mutex_lock(&stp->st_mutex);
>  	status = check_stateid_generation(stateid, &stp->st_stid.sc_stateid, nfsd4_has_session(cstate));
>  	if (status == nfs_ok)
>  		status = nfs4_check_fh(current_fh, &stp->st_stid);
>  	if (status != nfs_ok)
> -		up_write(&stp->st_rwsem);
> +		mutex_unlock(&stp->st_mutex);
>  	return status;
>  }
>  
> @@ -5030,7 +5037,7 @@ static __be32 nfs4_preprocess_confirmed_seqid_op(struct nfsd4_compound_state *cs
>  		return status;
>  	oo = openowner(stp->st_stateowner);
>  	if (!(oo->oo_flags & NFS4_OO_CONFIRMED)) {
> -		up_write(&stp->st_rwsem);
> +		mutex_unlock(&stp->st_mutex);
>  		nfs4_put_stid(&stp->st_stid);
>  		return nfserr_bad_stateid;
>  	}
> @@ -5062,12 +5069,12 @@ nfsd4_open_confirm(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
>  	oo = openowner(stp->st_stateowner);
>  	status = nfserr_bad_stateid;
>  	if (oo->oo_flags & NFS4_OO_CONFIRMED) {
> -		up_write(&stp->st_rwsem);
> +		mutex_unlock(&stp->st_mutex);
>  		goto put_stateid;
>  	}
>  	oo->oo_flags |= NFS4_OO_CONFIRMED;
>  	nfs4_inc_and_copy_stateid(&oc->oc_resp_stateid, &stp->st_stid);
> -	up_write(&stp->st_rwsem);
> +	mutex_unlock(&stp->st_mutex);
>  	dprintk("NFSD: %s: success, seqid=%d stateid=" STATEID_FMT "\n",
>  		__func__, oc->oc_seqid, STATEID_VAL(&stp->st_stid.sc_stateid));
>  
> @@ -5143,7 +5150,7 @@ nfsd4_open_downgrade(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
>  	nfs4_inc_and_copy_stateid(&od->od_stateid, &stp->st_stid);
>  	status = nfs_ok;
>  put_stateid:
> -	up_write(&stp->st_rwsem);
> +	mutex_unlock(&stp->st_mutex);
>  	nfs4_put_stid(&stp->st_stid);
>  out:
>  	nfsd4_bump_seqid(cstate, status);
> @@ -5196,7 +5203,7 @@ nfsd4_close(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
>  	if (status)
>  		goto out; 
>  	nfs4_inc_and_copy_stateid(&close->cl_stateid, &stp->st_stid);
> -	up_write(&stp->st_rwsem);
> +	mutex_unlock(&stp->st_mutex);
>  
>  	nfsd4_close_open_stateid(stp);
>  
> @@ -5422,7 +5429,7 @@ init_lock_stateid(struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp, struct nfs4_lockowner *lo,
>  	stp->st_access_bmap = 0;
>  	stp->st_deny_bmap = open_stp->st_deny_bmap;
>  	stp->st_openstp = open_stp;
> -	init_rwsem(&stp->st_rwsem);
> +	mutex_init(&stp->st_mutex);
>  	list_add(&stp->st_locks, &open_stp->st_locks);
>  	list_add(&stp->st_perstateowner, &lo->lo_owner.so_stateids);
>  	spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);
> @@ -5591,7 +5598,7 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
>  					&open_stp, nn);
>  		if (status)
>  			goto out;
> -		up_write(&open_stp->st_rwsem);
> +		mutex_unlock(&open_stp->st_mutex);
>  		open_sop = openowner(open_stp->st_stateowner);
>  		status = nfserr_bad_stateid;
>  		if (!same_clid(&open_sop->oo_owner.so_client->cl_clientid,
> @@ -5600,7 +5607,7 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
>  		status = lookup_or_create_lock_state(cstate, open_stp, lock,
>  							&lock_stp, &new);
>  		if (status == nfs_ok)
> -			down_write(&lock_stp->st_rwsem);
> +			mutex_lock(&lock_stp->st_mutex);
>  	} else {
>  		status = nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op(cstate,
>  				       lock->lk_old_lock_seqid,
> @@ -5704,7 +5711,7 @@ out:
>  		    seqid_mutating_err(ntohl(status)))
>  			lock_sop->lo_owner.so_seqid++;
>  
> -		up_write(&lock_stp->st_rwsem);
> +		mutex_unlock(&lock_stp->st_mutex);
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * If this is a new, never-before-used stateid, and we are
> @@ -5874,7 +5881,7 @@ nfsd4_locku(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
>  fput:
>  	fput(filp);
>  put_stateid:
> -	up_write(&stp->st_rwsem);
> +	mutex_unlock(&stp->st_mutex);
>  	nfs4_put_stid(&stp->st_stid);
>  out:
>  	nfsd4_bump_seqid(cstate, status);
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/state.h b/fs/nfsd/state.h
> index 986e51e..64053ea 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/state.h
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/state.h
> @@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ struct nfs4_ol_stateid {
>  	unsigned char			st_access_bmap;
>  	unsigned char			st_deny_bmap;
>  	struct nfs4_ol_stateid		*st_openstp;
> -	struct rw_semaphore		st_rwsem;
> +	struct mutex			st_mutex;
>  };
>  
>  static inline struct nfs4_ol_stateid *openlockstateid(struct nfs4_stid *s)
> -- 
> 2.7.4

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-14 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-07 15:37 Files leak from nfsd in 4.7.1-rc1 (and more?) Oleg Drokin
2016-06-07 17:10 ` Jeff Layton
2016-06-07 17:30   ` Oleg Drokin
2016-06-07 20:04     ` Jeff Layton
2016-06-07 23:39       ` Oleg Drokin
2016-06-08  0:03         ` Jeff Layton
2016-06-08  0:46           ` Oleg Drokin
2016-06-08  2:22           ` Oleg Drokin
2016-06-08  3:55             ` Oleg Drokin
2016-06-08 10:58             ` Jeff Layton
2016-06-08 14:44               ` Oleg Drokin
2016-06-08 16:10               ` Oleg Drokin
2016-06-08 17:22                 ` Jeff Layton
2016-06-08 17:37                   ` Oleg Drokin
2016-06-09  2:55                   ` [PATCH] nfsd: Always lock state exclusively Oleg Drokin
2016-06-09 10:13                     ` Jeff Layton
2016-06-09 21:01                   ` [PATCH] nfsd: Close a race between access checking/setting in nfs4_get_vfs_file Oleg Drokin
2016-06-10  4:18                     ` Oleg Drokin
2016-06-10 10:50                       ` Jeff Layton
2016-06-10 20:55                         ` J . Bruce Fields
2016-06-11 15:41                           ` Oleg Drokin
2016-06-12  1:33                             ` Jeff Layton
2016-06-12  2:06                               ` Oleg Drokin
2016-06-12  2:50                                 ` Jeff Layton
2016-06-12  3:15                                   ` Oleg Drokin
2016-06-12 13:13                                     ` Jeff Layton
2016-06-13  1:26                                     ` [PATCH v2] nfsd: Always lock state exclusively Oleg Drokin
2016-06-14 15:38                                       ` J . Bruce Fields [this message]
2016-06-14 15:53                                         ` Oleg Drokin
2016-06-14 18:50                                           ` J . Bruce Fields
2016-06-14 22:52                                             ` Jeff Layton
2016-06-14 22:54                                               ` Oleg Drokin
2016-06-14 22:57                                                 ` Jeff Layton
2016-06-15  3:28                                                   ` [PATCH 0/3] nfsd state handling fixes Oleg Drokin
2016-06-15  3:28                                                     ` [PATCH 1/3] nfsd: Always lock state exclusively Oleg Drokin
2016-06-15  3:28                                                     ` [PATCH 2/3] nfsd: Extend the mutex holding region around in nfsd4_process_open2() Oleg Drokin
2016-06-15  3:28                                                     ` [PATCH 3/3] nfsd: Make init_open_stateid() a bit more whole Oleg Drokin
2016-06-16  1:54                                                     ` [PATCH 0/3] nfsd state handling fixes Oleg Drokin
2016-06-16  2:07                                                       ` J . Bruce Fields
2016-06-14 15:46                                       ` [PATCH v2] nfsd: Always lock state exclusively J . Bruce Fields
2016-06-14 15:56                                         ` Oleg Drokin
2016-06-14 18:46                                           ` J . Bruce Fields
2016-06-15  2:19                                             ` Oleg Drokin
2016-06-15 13:31                                               ` J . Bruce Fields
2016-06-09 12:13               ` Files leak from nfsd in 4.7.1-rc1 (and more?) Andrew W Elble

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160614153808.GD25973@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=green@linuxhacker.ru \
    --cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).