From: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Add Power Management Unit driver
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 10:26:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160614172621.GA16566@psi-dev26.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465920434.30123.87.camel@linux.intel.com>
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 07:07:14PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 17:58 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 17:29 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > > * Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 12:43 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > > In the TRM it's called Power Management Unit, though once or
> > > > > twice
> > > > > in some
> > > > > documents as Power Management Controller. I actually woudn't
> > > > > like to
> > > > > use PMC
> > > > > abbreviation to not be confused with pmc_atom.c and many other
> > > > > variation of
> > > > > existing PMC drivers of other Intel platforms.
> > > > >
> > > > > PM* as a prefix might be too short to conflict with Power
> > > > > Management
> > > > > framework
> > > > > in the kernel. P-Unit (punit*) is existing part in SoC which
> > > > > will
> > > > > have its own
> > > > > driver in the future, so, can't use it either.
> > > > >
> > > > > pwr*, pwrmu*, scpmu* (as of South Complex Power Management Unit)
> > > > > —
> > > > > one of them?
> > > >
> > > > 'pwr' certainly sounds good to me! PWMU perhaps?
> > >
> > > Wouldn't be a bit confusing with pwm? I would stay at 'pwr'.
> >
> > Yeah, indeed - so pwr it is?
>
> Yes. Will rename in this way, re-test and re-send.
I'm curious about that. What pmu prefix would stand for?
Br, David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-14 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-13 20:18 [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Add Power Management Unit driver Andy Shevchenko
2016-06-14 10:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-06-14 13:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-06-14 15:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-06-14 15:45 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-06-14 15:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-06-14 16:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-06-14 17:26 ` David Cohen [this message]
2016-06-14 17:37 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-06-14 17:38 ` David Cohen
2016-06-14 17:37 ` David Cohen
2016-06-14 17:48 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160614172621.GA16566@psi-dev26.jf.intel.com \
--to=david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).