From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751937AbcFPHVu (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 16 Jun 2016 03:21:50 -0400
Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:62850 "EHLO mga09.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751246AbcFPHVt (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 16 Jun 2016 03:21:49 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,478,1459839600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="988575443"
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 07:24:53 +0800
From: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched: fix first task of a task group is attached
 twice
Message-ID: <20160615232453.GN8105@intel.com>
References: <CAKfTPtB_yb0P2FEZ4AKR6+Hjad_7dOxiC_w702RGOV6FnDWR8g@mail.gmail.com>
 <1464623541-25429-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
 <20160615191914.GM8105@intel.com>
 <CAKfTPtDwPmjCV41TcBVURfHvM-7Qpx0n57i9h3Xzm90UHLbM1Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtDwPmjCV41TcBVURfHvM-7Qpx0n57i9h3Xzm90UHLbM1Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 09:12:58AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > Then, when enqueued, both cfs_rq and task will be decayed to 0, due to
> > a large gap between 1 and now, no?
> 
> yes, like it is done currently (but 1ns later) .

Well, currently, cfs_rq will be decayed to 0, but will then add the task.
So it turns out the current result is right. Attached twice, but result
is right. Correct?