linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Abdul Haleem <abdhalee@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] workqueue:Fix affinity of an unbound worker of a node with 1 online CPU
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 14:45:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160616124548.GE30921@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466079084.19127.2.camel@ellerman.id.au>

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:11:24PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Peterz do you want to send a SOB'ed patch, or can we take what you posted and
> add your SOB?

So I took Ego's first patch, so as to not steal his credits take that
one and then see below.

---
Subject: workqueue: Fix setting affinity of unbound worker threads
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Thu Jun 16 14:38:42 CEST 2016

With commit e9d867a67fd03ccc ("sched: Allow per-cpu kernel threads to
run on online && !active"), __set_cpus_allowed_ptr() expects that only
strict per-cpu kernel threads can have affinity to an online CPU which
is not yet active.

This assumption is currently broken in the CPU_ONLINE notification
handler for the workqueues where restore_unbound_workers_cpumask()
calls set_cpus_allowed_ptr() when the first cpu in the unbound
worker's pool->attr->cpumask comes online. Since
set_cpus_allowed_ptr() is called with pool->attr->cpumask in which
only one CPU is online which is not yet active, we get the following
WARN_ON during an CPU online operation.

------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 40 PID: 248 at kernel/sched/core.c:1166
__set_cpus_allowed_ptr+0x228/0x2e0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 40 PID: 248 Comm: cpuhp/40 Not tainted 4.6.0-autotest+ #4
<..snip..>
Call Trace:
[c000000f273ff920] [c00000000010493c] __set_cpus_allowed_ptr+0x2cc/0x2e0 (unreliable)
[c000000f273ffac0] [c0000000000ed4b0] workqueue_cpu_up_callback+0x2c0/0x470
[c000000f273ffb70] [c0000000000f5c58] notifier_call_chain+0x98/0x100
[c000000f273ffbc0] [c0000000000c5ed0] __cpu_notify+0x70/0xe0
[c000000f273ffc00] [c0000000000c6028] notify_online+0x38/0x50
[c000000f273ffc30] [c0000000000c5214] cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x84/0x250
[c000000f273ffc90] [c0000000000c562c] cpuhp_up_callbacks+0x5c/0x120
[c000000f273ffce0] [c0000000000c64d4] cpuhp_thread_fun+0x184/0x1c0
[c000000f273ffd20] [c0000000000fa050] smpboot_thread_fn+0x290/0x2a0
[c000000f273ffd80] [c0000000000f45b0] kthread+0x110/0x130
[c000000f273ffe30] [c000000000009570] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x6c
---[ end trace 00f1456578b2a3b2 ]---

This patch fixes this by limiting the mask to the intersection of
the pool affinity and online CPUs.

Changelog-cribbed-from: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reported-by: Abdul Haleem <abdhalee@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c |    6 +-----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -4600,15 +4600,11 @@ static void restore_unbound_workers_cpum
 	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, pool->attrs->cpumask))
 		return;
 
-	/* is @cpu the only online CPU? */
 	cpumask_and(&cpumask, pool->attrs->cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
-	if (cpumask_weight(&cpumask) != 1)
-		return;
 
 	/* as we're called from CPU_ONLINE, the following shouldn't fail */
 	for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool)
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task,
-						  pool->attrs->cpumask) < 0);
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, &cpumask) < 0);
 }
 
 /*

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-16 12:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <573D9C2D.4020609@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
     [not found] ` <20160526151137.GA26508@in.ibm.com>
2016-06-07 12:29   ` WARNING at kernel/sched/core.c:1166 while booting 4.6.0 mainline on ppc64le bare metal Abdul Haleem
2016-06-07 15:14     ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix CPU Online handling for unbounded worker threads Gautham R. Shenoy
2016-06-07 15:14       ` [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the beginning of CPU_ONLINE Gautham R. Shenoy
2016-06-15 15:53         ` Tejun Heo
2016-06-15 19:28           ` Gautham R Shenoy
2016-06-16 19:35             ` Tejun Heo
2016-06-21 14:12               ` Gautham R Shenoy
2016-06-21 15:36                 ` Tejun Heo
2016-06-21 19:37                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-21 19:43                     ` Tejun Heo
2016-06-21 19:47                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-22  5:15                         ` Gautham R Shenoy
2016-06-24  9:00               ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/core: Allow kthreads to fall back to online && !active cpus tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2016-06-07 15:14       ` [PATCH 2/2] workqueue:Fix affinity of an unbound worker of a node with 1 online CPU Gautham R. Shenoy
2016-06-08  6:03         ` Abdul Haleem
2016-06-14 11:22         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-15 10:19           ` Gautham R Shenoy
2016-06-15 11:32             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-15 12:50               ` Gautham R Shenoy
2016-06-15 13:14                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-15 16:01                   ` Tejun Heo
2016-06-16 12:11                     ` Michael Ellerman
2016-06-16 12:45                       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-06-16 19:39                         ` Tejun Heo
2016-06-17  1:49                           ` Michael Ellerman
2016-07-15  5:27                           ` Gautham R Shenoy
     [not found]                           ` <57887507.911f240a.687de.08c5SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2016-07-15 12:10                             ` Tejun Heo
2016-06-13  5:44       ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix CPU Online handling for unbounded worker threads Gautham R Shenoy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160616124548.GE30921@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=abdhalee@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).