From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@redhat.com,
namhyung@kernel.org, kapileshwar.singh@arm.com,
scottwood@freescale.com, hekuang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] perf: Add sizeof operator support
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:08:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160617150827.112f7a8d@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57644828.3000000@arm.com>
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:57:44 -0500
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> wrote:
> That is the simple case, initially I was going to just hand code some of
> the sizeofs in the kernel, but then I started noticing more complex
> cases, and why I RFCed this patch.
>
> For example, on x64/xen there are fair number with sizeof(pXXval_t),
> IIRC I've also seen a fair number of sizeof(struct page *). Some, but I
> dont think all of these case be determined from the field sizes like
> this one:
Right, but there's no easy fix for that. Your patch wont fix these,
because they can change over time.
Now, what we can do is add a sizeof() helper that is like the
TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM() macro. We could add a TRACE_DEFINE_SIZEOF(), that
basically does the same, and in update_event_printk() we could
substitute the sizeof() with the actual number value.
You want to take a crack at that?
Take a look at commit 0c564a538aa93.
-- Steve
>
> [root@X tracing]# cat events/xen/xen_mmu_set_pte/format
> name: xen_mmu_set_pte
> ID: 45
> format:
> field:unsigned short common_type; offset:0; size:2;
> signed:0;
> field:unsigned char common_flags; offset:2; size:1;
> signed:0;
> field:unsigned char common_preempt_count; offset:3;
> size:1; signed:0;
> field:int common_pid; offset:4; size:4; signed:1;
>
> field:pte_t * ptep; offset:8; size:8; signed:0;
> field:pteval_t pteval; offset:16; size:8; signed:0;
>
> print fmt: "ptep %p pteval %0*llx (raw %0*llx)", REC->ptep,
> (int)sizeof(pteval_t) * 2, (unsigned long
> long)pte_val(native_make_pte(REC->pteval)), (int)sizeof(pteval_t) * 2,
> (unsigned long long)REC->pteval
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-17 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-14 16:38 [RFC/PATCH] perf: Add sizeof operator support Jeremy Linton
2016-06-17 16:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-06-17 16:32 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-17 16:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-06-17 18:57 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-17 19:08 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2016-06-20 0:29 ` Namhyung Kim
2017-04-30 22:06 ` Jon Masters
2017-05-02 11:47 ` Jeremy Linton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160617150827.112f7a8d@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=hekuang@huawei.com \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=kapileshwar.singh@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).