On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 05:02:33PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday, June 17, 2016 5:50:14 PM CEST Saeed Mahameed wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 7:04:54 PM CEST Saeed Mahameed wrote: > > > Ok, I see. It would be nice if the process had a way to avoid build regressions > > > in linux-next, in particular if you already have a fix by the time a patch > > > that introduces a problem gets added. > > > > > > > The reason we added this tree is to get 0-day testing but currently it > > makes some unwanted noise > > so we will remove it until we figure it out. > > I think you can simply ask Fengguang Wu to add your git tree to the list > of trees he pulls from for the 0-day test bot. It is not 0-day only, but linux-next too. It works flawlessly for RDMA topics and Doug receives cleaned and fully tested patches. Sadly enough, it didn't work well for mlx5 net part. Till further notice, I removed mlx5 net part (submission queue) from my tree and from linux-next.