From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932987AbcFUAUq (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2016 20:20:46 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:50201 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932598AbcFUAUf (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2016 20:20:35 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 17:11:51 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd To: Stefan Agner Cc: Bhhuvanchandra DV , Shawn Guo , gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, jslaby@suse.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] tty: serial: fsl_lpuart: support suspend/resume Message-ID: <20160621001151.GE1521@codeaurora.org> References: <20160609151039.20817-1-bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com> <20160609151039.20817-3-bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com> <20160611140341.GT20243@tiger> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/13, Stefan Agner wrote: > > > On June 13, 2016 5:18:19 PM PDT, Bhhuvanchandra DV wrote: > >Hi Shawn, > > > >On 06/11/2016 02:03 PM, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 08:40:33PM +0530, Bhuvanchandra DV wrote: > >>> From: Stefan Agner > >>> > >>> In order to allow wake support in STOP sleep mode, clocks are > >>> needed. Use imx_clk_gate2_cgr to disable automatic clock gating > >>> in low power mode STOP. This allows to enable wake by UART using: > >>> echo enabled > /sys/class/tty/ttyLP0/power/wakeup > >>> > >>> However, if wake is not enabled, the driver should disable the > >>> clocks explicitly to save power. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner > >>> --- > >>> drivers/clk/imx/clk-vf610.c | 12 ++++++------ > >> Please send clock driver changes in a separate patch. > > The changes are dependet on each other, hence I put it in a single patch. But since it is a new feature it shouldn't really matter... > > > > >How about splitting this patchset to two? few patches are having minor > >fixes and the few patches might need some review and discussions. > >May be some thing like DMA fixes and the other minor fixes. > > I don't think that splitting up the patchset is necessary, with the current order it is possible to pick up the fixes independently... > I think the main problem is clk and tty subsystems are modified in the same patch here. Did you want an ack from clk maintainers here or will the patch be split so we can take the clk part through clk tree? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project