From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933064AbcFUBGu (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2016 21:06:50 -0400 Received: from LGEAMRELO11.lge.com ([156.147.23.51]:36698 "EHLO lgeamrelo11.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933036AbcFUBGl (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2016 21:06:41 -0400 X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.125 X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.222.33 X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 10:05:08 +0900 From: Byungchul Park To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, npiggin@suse.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, minchan@kernel.org, sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] lockdep: Apply bit_spin_lock lockdep to zram Message-ID: <20160621010508.GJ2279@X58A-UD3R> References: <1466398515-1005-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> <1466398515-1005-4-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> <20160620153619.GA649@swordfish> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160620153619.GA649@swordfish> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:36:19AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > Hello, > > just for information Thank you for informing it. > > there was a proposal from -rt people to use normal spinlocks > for table's entries, rather that bitspinlock. I had a patch > some time ago, will obtain some performance data and post > RFC [may be tomorrow]. > > -ss >