From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751705AbcFUMpf (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2016 08:45:35 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:43167 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751415AbcFUMpe (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2016 08:45:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:42:47 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Chris Metcalf Cc: Sudip Mukherjee , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 Message-ID: <20160621124247.GM30921@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20160621154638.1169904b@canb.auug.org.au> <5768E650.2080506@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 08:08:29AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: > > On inspection, I note that the arch/tile/include/atomic_32.h header has > > ATOMIC64_OP(and) > ATOMIC64_OP(or) > ATOMIC64_OP(xor) > > but these should be ATOMIC64_OPS, plural. Bugger, I'll go fix. Clearly nobody has tilepro toolchains :/ > Peter, what toolchain were you using for tilepro build testing? tilegx-linux- > You need to have a tilepro toolchain (not tilegx) Ah, should I go use TARGET=tilepro-linux ? > and build with ARCH=tilepro. tilepro) ARCH=tile CROSS_COMPILE=tilegx-linux- if [ "$CONFIG" == "defconfig" ] ; then CONFIG=tilepro_defconfig fi ;; So I suppose that too is wrong.