From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752091AbcFWVrX (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 17:47:23 -0400 Received: from sauhun.de ([89.238.76.85]:50685 "EHLO pokefinder.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750866AbcFWVrU (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 17:47:20 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 23:46:55 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Benjamin Tissoires , Jonathan Corbet , Corey Minyard , Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , Andrew Duggan , Christopher Heiny , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/4] i2c: i801: add support of Host Notify Message-ID: <20160623214654.GA3707@katana> References: <1465484030-28838-1-git-send-email-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> <1465484030-28838-4-git-send-email-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> <20160615081247.GQ24234@mail.corp.redhat.com> <20160616060942.GA1403@tetsubishi> <20160623205552.GO32561@dtor-ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160623205552.GO32561@dtor-ws> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 01:55:52PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 08:09:42AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > - removed the .resume hook as upstream changed suspend/resume hooks= and there > > > > is no need in the end to re-enable host notify on resume (tested = on Lenovo > > > > t440 and t450). > > >=20 > > > Actually, this hook seemed to be required on the Lenovo T440 (Haswell) > > > but not on the T450 (Broadwell) laptop I have now here. > > >=20 > > > Wolfram, I can resend the whole series or a follow-up patch to re-ena= ble > > > after resume Host Notify. How do you prefer I deal with that? > >=20 > > That depends a little how we want to handle patch 4. I am going to apply > > patches 1+2 today to my tree. Then you can just resend patch 3 which I > > hope will get some review soon, but I will pick it up for 4.8 later > > nonetheless. If it is not causing too much dependency hassle, I'd prefer > > that patch 4 goes via Dmitry's input tree. >=20 > Any chance I could get a stable branch with these 2 patches based on 4.6 > so that I can pull it and merge the #4? This way we do not need to wait > for 2 releases to merge everything... Sure. git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git i2c/host-notify Thanks, Wolfram --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXbFjOAAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2mPUP/RYr+Q37qzjjGCsbQG2OGZ8E qZ7K97tSNr42r/UdGPD97IZLmjaoI0eGsb5E8BpJQjhIZ9uhg0r4+mT0VLaTRvpE OjDYNueUe3DCoH3s0oZxtrXBE9N7cAhbx0PDqKMJnF73v7/8Rjf6aiHiXn++WFxH fyNJdgoDdkbfAtymcTQTUoJwK5WnVuJmEPgwA0ppRuCQpnFwPVoJrdKxfolCQE9j GcPgimzr9cXxP+pU0KjSeExi+SnzMJBHWlBKR8vPSi76hXF1cabIn3eFdQJ0o/gH dwzmNYRPLbQU9LJmU02gEwKCv0wp3ewvGIlA0pwRiUkraIt2c3+7HlCnmJww/uN0 x7K6YKzldiwZT6K1RFlgMYaN33pcYYT6hzM1qN/53ZWtJ5BH4tohwPHSNhiro4nr 37+lS5xtwwrHQ7bryE03Ad9bMzpEph/wNwDdvrneGst4xT2x4BDZ/tD3edIQDjYQ ntdNtTLA1SCCm98lGumOe7oxStEgceUSJFhsJFmU6Qtwhv8PFWReDE8cJB00Yc94 VKzD2co9ji0XsgfiOEvrPoP5QtHqyIo+3dXbGaAGRYCnbtQU5ZHABNZDOet6N3oc qYX2KsnO1fUI6KJy7C5nVj5RkuXxrewdk+q00+MJGI3IP7XIV0FBqFteHUmlKHlN KpVrF7QO6+RMB5lA3CnO =J9te -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ--