linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
To: mingo@kernel.org, alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	prarit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] rtc-cmos: Workaround unwanted interrupt generation
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:19:07 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160627044907.GA29870@dhcppc9> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1466484019.git.panand@redhat.com>

On 21/06/2016:10:25:34 AM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> We have observed on few machines with rtc-cmos device that
> hpet_rtc_interrupt() is called before cmos_do_probe() could call
> hpet_rtc_timer_init(). It has not been observed during normal boot/reboot
> of machines. It *sometime* happens when system is booted with kdump
> secondary kernel. So, neither hpet_default_delta nor hpet_t1_cmp is
> initialized by the time interrupt is raised in the given situation.
> Therefore while loop of hpet_cnt_ahead() in hpet_rtc_timer_reinit() never
> completes. This leads to "NMI watchdog: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on
> cpu 0".
> 
> I am still clueless, how can an interrupt be raised before RTC is enabled.
> But i do not have any idea about this device, so I am putting this patch as
> RFC to get feedback from hpet/rtc-cmos developer. I am sure there would be
> some better solution than this.

Do you think that if I improve commit log of patches as pointed by Thomas and
send a formal version of these patches, then they should acceptable to upstream?

Thanks

~Pratyush
> 
> 
> 
> Pratyush Anand (2):
>   rtc/hpet: Factorize hpet_rtc_timer_init()
>   rtc/rtc-cmos: Initialize software counters before irq is registered
> 
>  arch/x86/include/asm/hpet.h |  2 ++
>  arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c      | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c      | 13 ++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.5.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-27  4:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-21  4:55 [PATCH RFC 0/2] rtc-cmos: Workaround unwanted interrupt generation Pratyush Anand
2016-06-21  4:55 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] rtc/hpet: Factorize hpet_rtc_timer_init() Pratyush Anand
2016-06-23  8:33   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-06-23 14:37     ` Pratyush Anand
2016-06-21  4:55 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] rtc/rtc-cmos: Initialize software counters before irq is registered Pratyush Anand
2016-06-27  4:49 ` Pratyush Anand [this message]
2016-07-04 16:19   ` [PATCH RFC 0/2] rtc-cmos: Workaround unwanted interrupt generation Pratyush Anand
2016-07-18 11:47     ` Pratyush Anand
2016-07-19 14:29       ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-07-20  3:56         ` Pratyush Anand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160627044907.GA29870@dhcppc9 \
    --to=panand@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).