From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: vtpm_proxy: Introduce flag to prevent sysfs entries
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 21:32:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160627183220.GD7268@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <576D7F34.50201@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 02:43:00PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 06/24/2016 01:48 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:36:55AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >>Introduce TPM_VTPM_PROXY_NO_SYSFS flag that prevents a vtpm_proxy driver
> >>instance from having the typical sysfs entries that shows the state of the
> >>TPM. The flag is to be set in the ioctl creating the vtpm_proxy device
> >>pair and maps on a new chip flags TPM_CHIP_FLAG_NO_SYSFS.
> >No other subsystem does something so goofy, this really needs to be
> >part of namespace support for TPM.
>
> And I am not sure how to go about this. TPM2 by the way doesn't have such
> entries, so it's much better from that perspective.
>
> >
> >Why can't you just make the sysfs files unreadable in user space?
>
> There are actually ways to go about this. Likely bind-mounting over
> /sys/device/virtual/tpm would be one solution to hide all virtual TPM
> device. Another is applying an AppArmor policy to the container denying
> access to tpm directories or entries. SELinux would not be so easy.
>
> The flag in this patch seemed like a 'cheap' way to eliminate that problem
> as well.
Does it have any other qualities that would make this better than bind
mounting?
/Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-27 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-24 14:36 [PATCH] tpm: vtpm_proxy: Introduce flag to prevent sysfs entries Stefan Berger
2016-06-24 17:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-06-24 18:43 ` Stefan Berger
2016-06-24 19:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-06-27 18:32 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2016-06-30 16:17 ` Stefan Berger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160627183220.GD7268@intel.com \
--to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).