From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752776AbcF1NQ7 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 28 Jun 2016 09:16:59 -0400
Received: from mailout2.hostsharing.net ([83.223.90.233]:51509 "EHLO
	mailout2.hostsharing.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752382AbcF1NQ6 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 28 Jun 2016 09:16:58 -0400
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:21:05 +0200
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
        Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/quirks: Add early quirk to reset Apple
 AirPort card
Message-ID: <20160628132105.GA1532@wunner.de>
References: <cover.1465690253.git.lukas@wunner.de>
 <48d0972ac82a53d460e5fce77a07b2560db95203.1465690253.git.lukas@wunner.de>
 <20160612114902.GA15940@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160612114902.GA15940@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi Ingo,

On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 01:13:38PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> I've just posted v2, taking into account all of Bjorn's suggestions:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/12/65
>
> @Ingo Molnar: I noticed that you've removed the line breaks in
> read/write_pci_config_16(). I've carried that change over to v2
> even though it exceeds 80 chars/line and thus doesn't seem to
> comply with Documentation/CodingStyle, chapter 2.
>
> Please note that the stable designation in patch [3/3] needs to be
> amended with the sha1 of the two preceding patches after they have
> been merged.

Just wanted to send a gentle reminder that this series seems to still
be pending, at least I'm not seeing it in linux-next or tip/master.
If there is anything I can do to move this forward please let me know.

Thank you!

Lukas