linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: will.deacon@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	steve.capper@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] arm64: cpuinfo: Expose MIDR_EL1 and REVIDR_EL1 to sysfs
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:33:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160628153346.GF4585@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466507556-9027-1-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:12:36PM +0100, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> +#define CPUINFO_ATTR_RO(_name)							\
> +	static ssize_t show_##_name(struct device *dev,				\
> +			struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)		\
> +	{									\
> +		struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info = &per_cpu(cpu_data, dev->id);	\
> +										\
> +		if (info->reg_midr)						\
> +			return sprintf(buf, "0x%016x\n", info->reg_##_name);	\
> +		else								\
> +			return 0;						\
> +	}									\
> +	static DEVICE_ATTR(_name, 0444, show_##_name, NULL)
> +
> +CPUINFO_ATTR_RO(midr);
> +CPUINFO_ATTR_RO(revidr);

Since exposing these values is aimed at JIT code (and not human
readable), wouldn't it make more sense to present the binary value
instead of the ascii transformation?

-- 
Catalin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-28 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-21 11:12 [PATCH v6] arm64: cpuinfo: Expose MIDR_EL1 and REVIDR_EL1 to sysfs Suzuki K Poulose
2016-06-28 11:06 ` Will Deacon
2016-06-28 14:17   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-06-28 15:33 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2016-06-28 16:14   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-06-28 16:27   ` Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160628153346.GF4585@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=steve.capper@linaro.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).