From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751827AbcF3GSb (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2016 02:18:31 -0400 Received: from LGEAMRELO12.lge.com ([156.147.23.52]:55254 "EHLO lgeamrelo12.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750937AbcF3GS3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2016 02:18:29 -0400 X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.127 X-Original-MAILFROM: minchan@kernel.org X-Original-SENDERIP: 165.244.98.203 X-Original-MAILFROM: minchan@kernel.org X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.223.161 X-Original-MAILFROM: minchan@kernel.org Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:18:56 +0900 From: Minchan Kim To: Anshuman Khandual CC: Andrew Morton , , , Rik van Riel , Vlastimil Babka , Joonsoo Kim , Mel Gorman , Hugh Dickins , Rafael Aquini , , Jonathan Corbet , John Einar Reitan , , Sergey Senozhatsky , Gioh Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH v6v3 02/12] mm: migrate: support non-lru movable page migration Message-ID: <20160630061856.GA10526@bbox> References: <20160531000117.GB18314@bbox> <575E7F0B.8010201@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160615023249.GG17127@bbox> <5760F970.7060805@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160616002617.GM17127@bbox> <5762200F.5040908@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160616053754.GQ17127@bbox> <5770BEC5.3010807@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160628063912.GA25560@bbox> <5774B49D.6080000@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5774B49D.6080000@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on LGEKRMHUB01/LGE/LG Group(Release 8.5.3FP6|November 21, 2013) at 2016/06/30 15:18:25, Serialize by Router on LGEKRMHUB01/LGE/LG Group(Release 8.5.3FP6|November 21, 2013) at 2016/06/30 15:18:26, Serialize complete at 2016/06/30 15:18:26 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:26:45AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > >> Did you get a chance to test the driver out ? I am still concerned about how to > >> handle the struct address_space override problem within the struct page. > > > > Hi Anshuman, > > > > Slow but I am working on that. :) However, as I said, I want to do it > > I really appreciate. Was just curious about the problem and any potential > solution we can look into. > > > after soft landing of current non-lru-no-mapped page migration to solve > > current real field issues. > > yeah it makes sense. > > > > > About the overriding problem of non-lru-mapped-page, I implemented dummy > > driver as miscellaneous device and in test_mmap(file_operations.mmap), > > I changed a_ops with my address_space_operations. > > > > int test_mmap(struct file *filp, struct vm_area_struct *vma) > > { > > filp->f_mapping->a_ops = &test_aops; > > vma->vm_ops = &test_vm_ops; > > vma->vm_private_data = filp->private_data; > > return 0; > > } > > > > Okay. > > > test_aops should have *set_page_dirty* overriding. > > > > static int test_set_pag_dirty(struct page *page) > > { > > if (!PageDirty(page)) > > SetPageDirty*page); > > return 0; > > } > > > > Otherwise, it goes BUG_ON during radix tree operation because > > currently try_to_unmap is designed for file-lru pages which lives > > in page cache so it propagates page table dirty bit to PG_dirty flag > > of struct page by set_page_dirty. And set_page_dirty want to mark > > dirty tag in radix tree node but it's character driver so the page > > cache doesn't have it. That's why we encounter BUG_ON in radix tree > > operation. Anyway, to test, I implemented set_page_dirty in my dummy > > driver. > > Okay and the above test_set_page_dirty() example is sufficient ? I guess just return 0 is sufficeint without any dirting a page. > > > > > With only that, it doesn't work because I need to modify migrate.c to > > work non-lru-mapped-page and changing PG_isolated flag which is > > override of PG_reclaim which is cleared in set_page_dirty. > > Got it, so what changes you did ? Implemented PG_isolated differently > not by overriding PG_reclaim or something else ? Yes set_page_dirty > indeed clears the PG_reclaim flag. > > > > > With that, it seems to work. But I'm not saying it's right model now > > So the mapped pages migration was successful ? Even after overloading > filp->f_mapping->a_ops = &test_aops, we still have the RMAP information > intact with filp->f_mappinp pointed interval tree. But would really like > to see the code changes. > > > for device drivers. In runtime, replacing filp->f_mapping->a_ops with > > custom a_ops of own driver seems to be hacky to me. > > Yeah I thought so. > > > So, I'm considering now new pseudo fs "movable_inode" which will > > support > > > > struct file *movable_inode_getfile(const char *name, > > const struct file_operations *fop, > > const struct address_space_operations *a_ops) > > { > > struct path path; > > struct qstr this; > > struct inode *inode; > > struct super_block *sb; > > > > this.name = name; > > this.len = strlen(name); > > this.hash = 0; > > sb = movable_mnt.mnt_sb; > > patch.denty = d_alloc_pseudo(movable_inode_mnt->mnt_sb, &this); > > patch.mnt = mntget(movable_inode_mnt); > > > > inode = new_inode(sb); > > .. > > .. > > inode->i_mapping->a_ops = a_ops; > > d_instantiate(path.dentry, inode); > > > > return alloc_file(&path, FMODE_WRITE | FMODE_READ, f_op); > > } > > > > And in our driver, we can change vma->vm_file with new one. > > > > int test_mmap(struct file *filp, struct vm_area_structd *vma) > > { > > struct file *newfile = movable_inode_getfile("[test"], > > filep->f_op, &test_aops); > > vma->vm_file = newfile; > > .. > > .. > > } > > > > When I read mmap_region in mm/mmap.c, it's reasonable usecase > > which dirver's mmap changes vma->vm_file with own file. > > I will look into these details. > > > Anyway, it needs many subtle changes in mm/vfs/driver side so > > need to review from each maintainers related subsystem so I > > want to not be hurry. > > Sure, makes sense. Mean while it will be really great if you could share > your code changes as described above, so that I can try them out. > It's almost done for draft version and I'm doing stress test now and fortunately, doesn't see the problem until now. I will send you when I'm ready. Thanks.